Author Topic: PURE Rebuttal - It All Makes Sense Now (Read 12940 times)

Carey · « **Reply #30 on:** August 07, 2003, 08:14:00 AM »

Whats wrong Sue, you don't want people to know the rest of the story about you?

Anonymous · « **Reply #31 on:** August 07, 2003, 12:57:00 PM »

If it's not legally correct, so what? I've seen court cases scanned and put on public web sites, this one included.

Me thinks you're just buying time :

:

Anonymous · « **Reply #32 on:** August 07, 2003, 02:59:00 PM »

How about the ISAC website?
http:/www.straightincorporated.com

:idea:

Anonymous · « **Reply #33 on:** August 07, 2003, 03:01:00 PM »

Or THE STRAIGHTS,
http://www.thestraights.com

Both these websites are linked to PURE.

Anonymous · « **Reply #34 on:** August 07, 2003, 03:02:00 PM »

Correct URL;
http://www.straightincorporated.com

Anonymous · « **Reply #35 on:** August 07, 2003, 03:07:00 PM »

Are you serious?? ISAC is linked to PURE?? That's good information. FaceKhan is always referring to ISAC. Wonder if it's Jeff Berryman posing as yet another multiple personality. :

:

Carey · « **Reply #36 on:** August 07, 2003, 03:54:00 PM »

I beleive ISAC removed the link that it once had to PURE, Inc. I had spoken with them about the danger of being associated with Sue.

Anonymous · « **Reply #37 on:** August 07, 2003, 04:10:00 PM »

I don't think Anon was saying ISAC and The Straights are part of PURE, just that PURE has links to these organization on her website.

Was PURE at the conference or anyone else associated with them?

Carey · « **Reply #38 on:** August 07, 2003, 04:59:00 PM »

I did not go to the conference, so I don't know for sure. However, I do know that quite a few of Sue's followers, including Sue as she was pushing it, were planning on going.

I do know that ISAC had a link to Sue's website on their website, however I believe that they did remove it. At least they told me they were going to remove it. I have not recently checked.

Anonymous · « **Reply #39 on:** August 07, 2003, 05:34:00 PM »

Anybody know the names of the 2 people writing books who came to the conference?

anon · « **Reply #40 on:** August 07, 2003, 07:17:00 PM »

[ This Message was edited by: KarenZ on 2003-10-17 15:19 ]

Anonymous · « **Reply #41 on:** August 08, 2003, 12:59:00 PM »

I find it interesting that IF the new court document is FAVORABLE for PURE that it would be on THEIR website - right next to the lame excuse Sue gave for the original one posted here. IF it was favorable for PURE, it would be all over the websites that she and her multiple personalities post on.

So, WHERE IS THIS WONDERFUL COURT DOCUMENT???

Anonymous · « **Reply #42 on:** August 08, 2003, 02:48:00 PM »

I find it interesting that none of these pro-active websites even mention the WWASPS v. PURE lawsuit, much less any information about it.

INTREPIDNETREPORTERS.COM (PURE)

ISAC (international survivors action committee)

The Straights Dot Com (Wes Fager)

- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -

What's wrong with this picture?

:

:

Anonymous · « **Reply #43 on:** August 08, 2003, 03:06:00 PM »

Ever think it is probably not important? Who cares about Pure Rebuttal, really who cares! It has nothing to do with the fight against WWASPS or Straights. Only one individual seems to care about it, and that one individual does give her name but also wears bags, sort of like pure rebuttal.

Anonymous · « **Reply #44 on:** August 09, 2003, 06:19:00 PM »

It has EVERYTHING to do with the class action suit - Quit trying to take the focus on yourselves. By the way - We're STILL waiting for the court document you say you have that shows PURE in a favorable light!

Fornits Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora An open discussion about the troubled parent industry

Author Topic: PURE Rebuttal - It All Makes Sense Now (Read 12940 times)

Fornits
Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora
An open discussion about the troubled parent industry