Author Topic: PURE Sues Carey and Ginger?????  (Read 1346 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
PURE Sues Carey and Ginger?????
« on: February 15, 2004, 04:28:00 AM »
Let me get this straight (no pun intended) -

Carey posted e-mails that spoke of the PURE supporters intentions of bringing WWASPS down, among other things on their "agenda" on this uncensored board, right?

Ginger is being sued for freedom of speech or in other words, not censoring this board, right?

The way I see it is that WWASPS read this board, found Carey, paid her for the e-mails that the PURE TREKKERS were sending to each other, right?

WWASPS has various legal actions against PURE and those associated with PURE for defamation of character-----so now PURE is bringing legal actions against Carey for spilling the beans and Ginger for "allowing" portions of those e-mails to be posted. Right?

If this is not the scenario, please correct me.

Also, what I see is that PURE only attacks WWASPS.  Not CEDU, Aspen Education Group (which is quite large)or various other troubled teen programs. Is Pure only defaming WWASPS because they are the ONLY PROGRAM that won't PAY them for their referrals?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
PURE Sues Carey and Ginger?????
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2004, 01:37:00 PM »
A Q: Carey posted e-mails that spoke of the PURE supporters intentions of bringing WWASPS down, among other things on their "agenda" on this uncensored board, right?

Wrong. She posted some private email on the board; but none concerning the bringing down of anybody. On the board, they were more of a look what they?ve done to me, nature.  See why they booted me; see how they censored me; that kind of stuff. None of it proving what she claims it does; except in her own storm rattled little brain.
Nor did any of it have anything to do with pure ?supporters? .


AQ: The way I see it is that WWASPS read this board, found Carey, paid her for the e-mails that the PURE TREKKERS were sending to each other, right?

Wrong again. She wrote and later called Ken Kay; told him how abused and maligned she had been; and told him she had a hard drive loaded with correspondence he would find interesting  (I paraphrase) and wanted a hundred grand.
Some dickering over price ensued; and I speculate; at some point they used the possibility of a supenia to encourage her to accept the much lower offer of 12.5 grand.  
Seems to me, a supenia would have been much more economical; than the price paid to Carey; plus the cost of the flight down;  and shipping back and all that was done in acquiring her hard drive.
Seems to me, if they had had any reason to believe, anyone already involved in the case in question, had this same stash of email; they would have simply supenia -their- hard drive.
Seems to me, they knew Carey had something unique.
And, They only knew she had it, b/c she told them.

I?m sure wwasp does read this board, now.  A few program parents used to drop by now and then; but I didn?t often think it was actually WWASP themselves. I could be wrong; but I think it fairly easy to tell the difference. I am certain that sense Carey?s revelation; and all the ensuing events; wwasp is now watching this board closely. In fact, I would say they have pretty much taken it over; and it is now next to useless, as far as its original intent.
By the way, Hello Joe. Call me sometime.


AQ; so now PURE is bringing legal actions against Carey for spilling the beans and Ginger for "allowing" portions of those e-mails to be posted. Right

Wrong. I really do not know the details and don?t want to, but,  Its not about the hard drive; or the email she posted.  It has more to do with things that were said on the board deemed to be of a slanderous nature.  



AQ: Is Pure only defaming WWASPS because they are the ONLY PROGRAM that won't PAY them for their referrals?

I most seriously do doubt it.
By frequent report, wwasp does pay, and pay well, for successful referrals.  I think it beyond doubt if PURE referred to wwasp, they would pay her.
As for the defamation charge; there are plenty of people completely unrelated to PURE, that don?t see it that way; Maybe we?ll get see 12 of them consider  All  the evidence, and agree.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
PURE Sues Carey and Ginger?????
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2004, 07:57:00 PM »
Isn't "slander" when someone tells lies to make the other party look bad?  What was slanderous about what Carey posted?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
PURE Sues Carey and Ginger?????
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2004, 08:13:00 PM »
WWASPS does not pay PURE a fee for their referrals.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »