Author Topic: Goodbye Trotsky  (Read 1672 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ajax13

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1615
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Goodbye Trotsky
« on: February 08, 2008, 02:38:50 PM »
The following comes from Robert Lifton's book on Chinese Communist Brainwashing:

"The totalist milieu maintains an aura of sacredness around its basic dogma, holding it out as an ultimate moral vision for the ordering of human existence. This sacredness is evident in the prohibition (whether or not explicit) against the questioning of basic assumptions, and in the reverence which is demanded for the originators of the Word, the present bearers of the Word, and the Word itself. While thus transcending ordinary concerns of logic, however, the milieu at the same time makes an exaggerated claim of airtight logic, of absolute "scientific" precision. Thus the ultimate moral vision becomes an ultimate science; and the man who dares to criticize it, or to harbor even unspoken alternative ideas, becomes not only immoral and irreverent, but also "unscientific". In this way, the philosopher kings of modern ideological totalism reinforce their authority by claiming to share in the rich and respected heritage of natural science. (Pages 427-428.)"
http://www.apologeticsindex.org/b07.html

Here is a description of what happens to a staffer who challenges the "bad manners only understand bad manners" science.  It comes from DavidPablo Escobar-Grant's Demon and Monk.  Mr. Escobar-Grant, a former staff member at AARC who was admitted to All About Receiving Cash as an adult, weeks shy of his twenty-second birthday. 

"I found what I was looking for in Carol, a middle aged "clinical" who had very little experience with manipulative addicts like me.  I spent some time with her, and quickly convinced her I didn't belong in an adolescent treatment centre.
...It took a few days, but when I asked where Carol was I found out she was gone.  She must have gone to Mr. Vause, and he figured she was to(sic) easily snowed, and was dangerous to the client population.  Sorry Carol!"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"AARC will go on serving youth and families as long as it will be needed, if it keeps open to God for inspiration" Dr. F. Dean Vause Executive Director


MR. NELSON: Mr. Speaker, AADAC has been involved with
assistance in developing the program of the Alberta Adolescent
Recovery Centre since its inception originally as Kids of the
Canadian West."
Alberta Hansard, March 24, 1992

Offline ajax13

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1615
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Goodbye Trotsky
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2008, 04:54:38 PM »
Over the years the Wiz has eliminated anybody who worked at AARC who stood between him and the money.   Was this calculated in order to harm others, or simply to get him what he wanted?
Villains

"What’s in a name—psychopath, sociopath, antisocial, or narcissist?

People who are destructive to others very often have a personality disorder in which narcissism is a major element. The greater their level of narcissism the more damaging a person will be to others. The two most toxic, dangerous and potentially destructive personality types are people with Narcissistic Personality Disorder and at the extreme end of the narcissism scale, Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD) sometimes also called psychopaths or sociopaths.

In APD, the word ‘antisocial’ is used not in the sense of social withdrawal but in the sense of having no loyalty or commitment to other people and of defying social principles, rules, and standards. A person with APD regularly disregards or violates the rights of others and exhibits at least three of the following from childhood or adolescence—failure to conform to normal standards of behaviour, repeated antisocial or illegal acts, deceit and dishonesty, consistent irresponsibility, impulsiveness and failure to plan ahead, disregard for their own or others safety, aggressiveness, and a lack of remorse.

Most authorities consider APD to be simply the most recent label for those once called psychopaths or sociopaths and that all three terms have the same meaning and are interchangeable. Others believe them to be separate, although similar and overlapping categories. Those who distinguish between the three categories believe that almost all psychopaths have APD but that not all of those who meet the criteria for APD are psychopaths. The psychopath they believe, might exhibit a variety of the above characteristics but in addition is also callous, insincerely charming, lacks empathy, compassion and a conscience, and experiences only basic emotions, such as anger and excitement, and not the full human range.

Some authorities prefer the term sociopath because they believe unfavourable social and family environments and lack of guidance and discipline in childhood prevents normal socialization which in turn causes antisocial behaviour. For our purposes though, it probably doesn’t matter whether we lump APD, psychopathy, and sociopathy together or see them as separate diagnoses. By any name, people with a collection of the characteristics described above are trouble. For simplicity’s sake and because the term psychopath has been around the longest, I will use it to describe people who fit into any of the three categories.

All psychopaths are narcissistic. There is a considerable overlap between narcissism and psychopathy and some mental health professionals believe that psychopaths are a subgroup of narcissism or that narcissism is a less severe form of psychopathy. Whatever the case, there is not always obvious differences between these destructive personality disorders although the psychopath usually has a greater sense of superiority, a more aggressive narcissism, and no gentle or positive feelings towards others, while a plain narcissist may have some.

Psychopaths come in a range of strengths and styles. Not all are serial killers, mass murderers, or even criminals (and not all criminals are psychopaths) although as many as 75 per cent of prison inmates could have APD. Most psychopaths are not violent, but are apparently normal, often respectable people leading ordinary lives, except for the grief they cause those closest to them. Their ruthlessness, lack of ethics and absolute self-interest even help some to become highly successful. Many are charming and appealing yet have a complete disregard for the rights of others and need to exert power over them to demonstrate their own superiority.

Many psychopaths are evident from childhood, indulging in vandalism, theft, cruelty to animals or other children, bullying or violence. Severe psychopaths recognize no limits or control and are incapable of feelings such as guilt, shame, fear, affection, or love. The psychopath gives free rein to their destructive impulses, hones in on other’s weaknesses and even when not violent, is vindictive and destructive, often for no other reason than their own amusement.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder also varies in severity and style. No two narcissists will display exactly the same combination of behaviours or to the same extent. Some are demanding and aggressive, some passive, some gregarious, others aloof. Some are angry, others calm, some are ‘warm’, and some are ‘cold’. Some have natures that are ‘light’ and others ‘dark’. They can be subtle or flagrant, affable or malicious, undisciplined or controlling. Some use charm and persuasion to get their way, others prefer intimidation."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"AARC will go on serving youth and families as long as it will be needed, if it keeps open to God for inspiration" Dr. F. Dean Vause Executive Director


MR. NELSON: Mr. Speaker, AADAC has been involved with
assistance in developing the program of the Alberta Adolescent
Recovery Centre since its inception originally as Kids of the
Canadian West."
Alberta Hansard, March 24, 1992