Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora An open discussion about the troubled parent industry
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I am not insinuating, I have stated that there are incentives to prescribe one competing medication over another. You may call it bribes if you like. In post soviet eastern bloc countries they call it "Gifts" so you choose.
Mathematics Disorder (cant wait to read the details) Caffeine Disorder Disorder of Written Expression Telephone Scatalogia (making obscene calls) and believe it or not you will be able to get reimbursed for having Malingering, because this will become a disorder that needs treatment…Woah!!!! ………. to name a very few. After 2011 a diagnosis (for the above, as well as many others) will qualify for payment by health insurance agencies.
One of the challenges for psychiatrists and/ or psychologists is to constantly bridge the gap between diagnosis and insurance reimbursement. They also need to keep their thumb on the pulse of what the pharmaceutical industry is testing or presently has in clinical trials so they can reduce couch time (which insurance companies hate) and prescribe more drugs.
I said the doctor needs to diagnose a patient and label them into a category that is acceptable to their insurance company in order to get paid for ongoing visits or medication. If the doctor submits “Afraid of mother-in-lawâ€
Hey Who, A little of your own advice back to you. If you calm down and listen up, you just might learn something.
I just think it's funny how he's totally clueless about the finer technical terms and keeps quoting things are totally off- the-mark.OK, I'll be nice and break it down.AMA=American Medical AssociationAPA=American psychiatric Association, MD's(not to be confused with the American Psychological Association, Ph.d's)Try to keep up, OK?Different animals.
Here is something more recent:Pharmaceutical companies fail to publicly reveal all of the money and gifts they give to physicians and health care workers—making it hard to know what the money is for …What they were doing," Ross says, "is saying that all of their payments were trade secrets … It's improbable that all of a company's payments were truly proprietary." Moreover, in 75 percent of the reports handed over to the researchers, the companies failed to identify the gift recipients despite a legal requirement to do so, Ross says.In Vermont, companies made 2416 such payments, which totaled $1 million. Half of all payments exceeded $177, up to a maximum of $20,000, and 68 percent were listed as food. In Minnesota, of 6238 payments totaling $22.4 million, half of the payments topped $1,000, and the largest was $922,239.…......Pharmaceutical companies' "marketing techniques and their reluctance to disclose them invite further misgivings about the industry.Link to article...
Guest wrote: Huh? What the fuck is the last poster talking about? Put down the bottle, quit jamming crystal meth up your ass, and come back later when you can string together a coherent train of thought. PSYParents. Welcome to Fornits TTI forum... Try to have a stomach for a little while until the forum anon posters feel you out(though some might always hate parents).
Who was that guy? Did not know too much about doctors and seemed really pissedoff.
Maybe they just really hate TheWho.
Quote from: ""Guest""Maybe they just really hate TheWho.The anon was a he, that logs in as RobertBruce. he was posting as a guest. Just thought you should know.
