Remove the poll

[Anonymous]

lols. why woud i care? just typical hyde. youv got zero cred with me. maybe another woud care what you thik

And you've zero cred with me. Nothing proved. SH is innocent.

This discussion is going in circles. Right now the only methodology is majority rule, on the basis of an ability to prove that you are a credible witness. As far as SH is concerned, Mike, Emil, and Ursus seem to be the only witnesses (not so sure about Ursus; he's an emptiness that can only repeat what others have said. No experiences of his own to tell. Big zero). Only Mike and Emil are credible witnesses, Ursus has been caught out in too many lies and has lost his credibility. Mike and Emil say SH is innocent, and so it stands. But of course there's a lot Mike and Emil don't know. So we're talking probabilities of innocence.

Curse, grumble, call me names, but that's where things stand. If you can come up with a better methodology for establishing truth, go for it.

[Anonymous]

:rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
HYDE IN ACTION

[Anonymous]

:rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
HYDE IN ACTION

American judicial system in action.  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:

[Anonymous]

SOME one got a big johnsson out of that!

[Anonymous]

lols. why woud i care? just typical hyde. youv got zero cred with me. maybe another woud care what you thik

And you've zero cred with me. Nothing proved. SH is innocent.

This discussion is going in circles. Right now the only methodology is majority rule, on the basis of an ability to prove that you are a credible witness. As far as SH is concerned, Mike, Emil, and Ursus seem to be the only witnesses (not so sure about Ursus; he's an emptiness that can only repeat what others have said. No experiences of his own to tell. Big zero). Only Mike and Emil are credible witnesses, Ursus has been caught out in too many lies and has lost his credibility. Mike and Emil say SH is innocent, and so it stands. But of course there's a lot Mike and Emil don't know. So we're talking probabilities of innocence.

Curse, grumble, call me names, but that's where things stand. If you can come up with a better methodology for establishing truth, go for it.

   To be clear, I am not claiming SH to be innocent.  I am claiming he is not guilty.  I am asking for some one that can provide something beside gossip and innuendo.  Until some one can, I say it was bullshit.

  In terms of the bigger picture here, which I was lectured on vis a via posting material that could be deemed as offensive, I really don't see that maintaining an unsubstantiated attack on a dead guy, aids in the credibility of this forum to offer objective critical comment on Hyde as an educational model.  IT seems to me that this stuff about SH is as irrelevant and silly as any of the stuff I have posted.  

Emil

[Che Gookin]

Mike posted on my forum:

Che,

Elsewhere they will be. It's your call. Take down the poll, with a formal apology, using your avatar, or I start polls about you. I'm being nice too nice t give you private warning.

You have 12 hours.

Mike

As Mike has not said please I can not remove the poll.

[Anonymous]

Objective critical commentary on Hyde as an educational model is a worthwhile pursuit. And anyone can do it. You don't need to have gone to Hyde. You can analyze other people's experience.

For those who attack Hyde's personalities, I say you had better be prepared to be grilled. Take Che with his kangaroo courts and his "I love to see Summer Holly pushing up daisies." Does he expect to be taken seriously? Perhaps among like-minded idiots.

[Anonymous]

///Hyde as an educational model\

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[Anonymous]

Mike posted on my forum:

Che,

Elsewhere they will be. It's your call. Take down the poll, with a formal apology, using your avatar, or I start polls about you. I'm being nice too nice t give you private warning.

You have 12 hours.

Mike

As Mike has not said please I can not remove the poll.

Che,

Post all the messages I sent you, and in particular the one detailing the content of my polls. There must be full context and 100% transparency for a fair discussion of my actions.

Mike

[Anonymous]

For those who attack Hyde's personalities, I say you had better be prepared to be grilled.

but its okay for you lto do it?

[Anonymous]

For those who attack Hyde's personalities, I say you had better be prepared to be grilled.

but its okay for you lto do it?

Yes, and I would expect to be grilled, to establish credibility.

[Anonymous]

:rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  
HYDE IN ACTION!

[Anonymous]

For those who attack Hyde's personalities, I say you had better be prepared to be grilled.

but its okay for you lto do it?

For whom to do what?  Pronouns without clear anticedants lead to unclear communications.  Sumner would have told you that.

[Anonymous]

For those who attack Hyde's personalities, I say you had better be prepared to be grilled.

but its okay for you lto do it?

For whom to do what?  Pronouns without clear anticedants lead to unclear communications.  Sumner would have told you that.

ill be sure to do my pushups right away before you rat me out t the dean

[Anonymous]

For those who attack Hyde's personalities, I say you had better be prepared to be grilled.

but its okay for you lto do it?

For whom to do what?  Pronouns without clear anticedants lead to unclear communications.  Sumner would have told you that.

ill be sure to do my pushups right away before you rat me out t the dean

  I would never rat you out honey. Just because I can speak well doesn't mean I'm an asshole. Just because you can't does not mean you're not.