Here's something that may or may not mean anything: different accreditation sources attributed to Bath vs. Woodstock?
First, I checked for Bath, ostensibly accredited by
AISNE. I checked on AISNE's website, no mention of Hyde School, neither campus. That, in and of itself, does not necessarily mean anything since, at least for AISNE,
Membership is open to any elementary or secondary school which is not-for-profit, nondiscriminatory, governed by a board of directors, and fiscally sound. Potential new members must have been, or be willing to be, accredited through AISNE (elementary schools only) or the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (all schools).http://www.aisne.org/member_services/ab ... t=overview[/list]In other words: Hyde, being a secondary school, really needs to be accredited by NEASC in order to qualify for accreditation by AISNE.
Incidentally, AISNE is not exactly a very transparent organization. It would appear that they do not want to be contacted by the public. There are very few contact links on their website (and the few that there are, are first names only), and certainly no section designated as such. The BOD is hidden in a members only section, which requires a password to enter.
On to
NEASC, which is a whole different ballgame. This is a far more professional organization, with everyone's name, background, and contact details fully disclosed, usually multiple times throughout the website. Since NEASC covers not only elementary and secondary schools, but also specialty, international, and vocational schools in addition to colleges and universities, there are consequently a number of subsections. Hyde falls under the section termed CIS:
http://www.neasc.org/neasc/aboutneasc.htm[/li][/list]
According to NEASC, Hyde-Bath was first accredited in 1970, and was last reviewed in 2000.
http://www.neasc.org/roster/mea.htmHyde-Woodstock was first accredited in 2002, and has not be reviewed yet.
http://www.neasc.org/roster/cta.htm