Toils Toils Troubles err.. bubbles..kk.. bleh

[Froderik]

Mal han matie chonnyang pito kapnunda.

Nat marun saeka tuko pam marun chuika tutnunda.

Take your time and think it over.

A big debt is repayed with only a few words.

Birds can hear the talk in the daytime, rats can hear the talk
at night.

Wtf, is this the translation? Korean, I'm guessing?

Gotta love them internet translator thingies, eh?
 
Fuck it, just spill the fucking beans already.

[Anne Bonney]

I have no idea what's going on.  I'm not 'in the loop'.  And yeah, I looked up what it was because I wanted to see what it said.

[Anonymous]

I don't understand.  What is going on here?

[Che Gookin]

Me spilling the beans never was going to happen. I was more curious what other people had to say in a similiar situation.

I promised I'd shut my yap and I will do just that. I might not be the best person at keeping my yap shut, but I'm damn sure I won't spill the beans in this situation.

[TheWho]

Thanks I got it covered. Unless you know who the man on the grassy mound was?

I'm also guessing they choose to contact me due to my discretion. That is something that in certain circles is far to lacking of late.

Yes, they choose to contact you because you have shown an incredible resistance to censorship and will speak the truth whether it benefits you personally or not and defend it to a fault and you have an uncanny understanding of the reason for discretion in many circumstances, where others don’t.  Stick by your word, but dont let them censor you.

Remember, “Censorship always defeats it own purpose, for it creates in the end the kind of society that is incapable of exercising real discretion.â€

[Anonymous]

Fornits is gay.

[Froderik]

I have no idea what's going on.  I'm not 'in the loop'.  And yeah, I looked up what it was because I wanted to see what it said.

You thought my "spill the beans" comment was directed at you? No.

(Again not directed at you, Anne) Wtf is up with this stupid bullshit? What a waste of fucking time. I want my 20 minutes back, you motherfuckers.

[Froderik]

Fornits is gay.

Well this thread sure as fucking hell is. :rofl:

[psy]

psy wrote:

In my opinion, they know what they are doing hurts kids yet continue to do it because it makes them money

Psy, I really haven’t paid close attention to the whole Sue S thing.  I have skimmed thru the many articles and web sites that have been posted here about her.  I know there is a major rift between fornits yourself and her and I mainly thought it was because you felt she betrayed the industry or misrepresented herself by acknowledging that WWASPS was probably not the best place for kids to attend but continued to refer kids to other programs (did I get that right?).
But do you really feel she thinks she is hurting kids when she refers them to programs? And only does it for the money?  I ask this because I find it hard to believe this.  There are very few people who are capable of purposefully hurting kids for the pure joy of it or for profit.  There is a special name for these people and there are very few of them in comparison with the rest of the population.

Well.  It's my opinion that Sue Scheff is a sociopath.  Total and complete sociopath.  No conscience at all.

I would think that she feels she is doing a good deed and helping families to solve their issues. (whether she is right or wrong in her thinking there is a distinct difference in how her motive should be perceived by others.)

Hey.  I helped you out by bothering to look up your posts, and you didn't jerk me around...  So could you do me a favor, read the following article (which is a concise view of Sue's history) and tell me what you think:

http://www.sueschefftruth.com/?p=12




















Oh.  and BTW, I still want that t-shirt.  I gave you a way out, but shit if i'm going to screw up a good opportunity to mock an industry member.

List of Oh-so-funny demands

Make it black with text that says... "i *heart* fornits.com" (along with a mushy new experimental Fornits mascot that must meet ginger's (eventual) approval).  On the back, I'm thinking ... "ask me about fornits.com"... and you have to wear it all day (or at least you'd be a good sport if you did) ... know what? i'll just send you an email you can forward to the printer people with the graphics and instructions...  I'll pay for a copy of what I'm about to give you on a t-shirt, along with one extra for a friend.  Shit...  Why don't we start a discussion on the web forum hosting thread about selling Fornits T-shirts.  We'll buy from you in bulk, until and if we find a cheaper supplier, and then sell the t-shirts in the online store.  I'll alert Ginger to this idea and see if she's interested.  The Mozilla project merchandizes to help.

Actually.  I'll send you two versions: one you are going to wear (and you promised a photo), and one that we could potentially sell and make a profit collectively.

Will work on that tonight.

[Anonymous]

T-shirt idea might backfire, you'll get all his bored do-nothing yuppie friends posting all day long too. Soon fornits will be totally compromised of stay at home moms and retired program dads.

[Anne Bonney]

I have no idea what's going on.  I'm not 'in the loop'.  And yeah, I looked up what it was because I wanted to see what it said.

You thought my "spill the beans" comment was directed at you? No.

(Again not directed at you, Anne) Wtf is up with this stupid bullshit? What a waste of fucking time. I want my 20 minutes back, you motherfuckers.

When you quote my post and reply to it I tend to think you're talking to me.

[Che Gookin]

Program dads never really retire. They merely find other people to spout their shit at once their kids file restraining orders against them.

[Anonymous]

So.... is the general reading audience here to conclude that Who profits from referrals to programs but we can't know the specifics?

80% say "spill the beans"

I read it as voting "Yes" means to keep his mouth shut.  "No" is to spill the beans.
Either way I am fairly confident, at this point, that he will not spill the beans.  I believe he has been contacted by now (if not shortly) and the voice of reasoning will prevail.

TSW, I am hopeing you will come back with your decision.  I dont know what time it is where you are, but it is Friday night here, and I wont get any sleep until I hear an answer or at least to know that someone has spoken to you.  If this is just a game ,I am not interested in your chess match.

I WANT TO BELIEVE

[TheWho]

psy wrote:

In my opinion, they know what they are doing hurts kids yet continue to do it because it makes them money

Psy, I really haven’t paid close attention to the whole Sue S thing.  I have skimmed thru the many articles and web sites that have been posted here about her.  I know there is a major rift between fornits yourself and her and I mainly thought it was because you felt she betrayed the industry or misrepresented herself by acknowledging that WWASPS was probably not the best place for kids to attend but continued to refer kids to other programs (did I get that right?).
But do you really feel she thinks she is hurting kids when she refers them to programs? And only does it for the money?  I ask this because I find it hard to believe this.  There are very few people who are capable of purposefully hurting kids for the pure joy of it or for profit.  There is a special name for these people and there are very few of them in comparison with the rest of the population.

Well.  It's my opinion that Sue Scheff is a sociopath.  Total and complete sociopath.  No conscience at all.

I would think that she feels she is doing a good deed and helping families to solve their issues. (whether she is right or wrong in her thinking there is a distinct difference in how her motive should be perceived by others.)

Hey.  I helped you out by bothering to look up your posts, and you didn't jerk me around...  So could you do me a favor, read the following article (which is a concise view of Sue's history) and tell me what you think:

http://www.sueschefftruth.com/?p=12




















Oh.  and BTW, I still want that t-shirt.  I gave you a way out, but shit if i'm going to screw up a good opportunity to mock an industry member.

List of Oh-so-funny demands

Make it black with text that says... "i *heart* fornits.com" (along with a mushy new experimental Fornits mascot that must meet ginger's (eventual) approval).  On the back, I'm thinking ... "ask me about fornits.com"... and you have to wear it all day (or at least you'd be a good sport if you did) ... know what? i'll just send you an email you can forward to the printer people with the graphics and instructions...  I'll pay for a copy of what I'm about to give you on a t-shirt, along with one extra for a friend.  Shit...  Why don't we start a discussion on the web forum hosting thread about selling Fornits T-shirts.  We'll buy from you in bulk, until and if we find a cheaper supplier, and then sell the t-shirts in the online store.  I'll alert Ginger to this idea and see if she's interested.  The Mozilla project merchandizes to help.

Actually.  I'll send you two versions: one you are going to wear (and you promised a photo), and one that we could potentially sell and make a profit collectively.

Will work on that tonight.

deal.... although, I am leaning towards sweatshirts, with fall coming up.   I'm done for tonight.  I'll read sues history and let you know what I think.

[Anonymous]

TheWho plays fornits like a violin.  :rofl: