Author Topic: Rep Def and SS  (Read 2431 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« on: August 11, 2007, 01:53:18 PM »
Rep Def and Sue Scheff must be working really hard to clean up the google search before the 20/20 show airs.  I would imagine they can forsee that lots of people will be google searching them over the next week.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2007, 01:56:21 PM »
gee ya think?  :rofl:  probably why they were wishin this site were offline. course her ass will probably be cut if she is supposed to be on 20/20. Not like that'll stop us.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2007, 02:28:25 PM »
It isn't just scheff's reutation that is on the line, it is also reputation defenders reputation that is on the line.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline webdiva

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2007, 02:30:56 PM »
Sues repuation is already fucked she can thank her self for that. and i would hope the RDs come out looking like fools for defending someone who was NOT worth of defense.

Quote from: ""Guest""
It isn't just scheff's reutation that is on the line, it is also reputation defenders reputation that is on the line.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
RIP Steve Matthews and all those we have lost along the way!

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2007, 02:47:39 PM »
I wonder how much more they can take before they finally "distance themselves" from this "problem."  For now, as long as she is willing to fork over the dough, they'll put in the time.

There are a number of these reputation salvaging companies on-line now, and some of them will go to quite criminal lengths for their clients.  And sometimes get into legal trouble for that.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Froderik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7547
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2007, 02:50:11 PM »
Sue really fucked herself in the ass this time.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2007, 02:56:09 PM »
http://www.blogdrive.com/tagboard.html


Sue has a blogdrive BLOG, lets complain.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2007, 03:05:09 PM »
It looks like these guys hate Rep Def, too.

;)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thr ... forum_id=2
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline webdiva

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2007, 03:29:36 PM »
what did she use? lol

Quote from: ""Froderik""
Sue really fucked herself in the ass this time.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
RIP Steve Matthews and all those we have lost along the way!

Offline webdiva

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #9 on: August 11, 2007, 03:31:36 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
http://www.blogdrive.com/tagboard.html


Sue has a blogdrive BLOG, lets complain.


complain about what? she has the right to make a fool of herself.  I would never be so hypocritical as to try to get someones blog taken down when i damn sure beleive in free speech.

even if it were george bush himself i wouldnt complain. of course he'd post far too many things to entertain me!

None the less. Free speech goes both ways, fuck censoring. Fuck complaining, let the bitch HANG HERSELF. She's GOOD AT IT!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
RIP Steve Matthews and all those we have lost along the way!

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2007, 04:16:47 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
http://www.blogdrive.com/tagboard.html


Sue has a blogdrive BLOG, lets complain.


I have a better idea:

Sign up for your own blogs with blogdrive, and make sure
to link to our favorite places

http://sueschefftruth.com
http://www.careybock.com
etc.

Or you could sign up for a blog with Blogger...

Or both. :D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline webdiva

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2007, 04:25:04 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
I have a better idea:

Sign up for your own blogs with blogdrive, and make sure
to link to our favorite places

http://sueschefftruth.com
http://www.careybock.com
etc.




Or you could sign up for a blog with Blogger...

Or both. :D

have several, all over.  the key is to comment on any and all articles blog post etc. about certain people w/ links back to certain sites.  

and we did successfully googlize the sue scheff posts once again. now we just gotta move them up! what fun.

and if ya have to choose go blogger cuz its indexed into google immediately.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
RIP Steve Matthews and all those we have lost along the way!

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2007, 04:31:04 PM »
Quote from: ""webdiva""
Quote from: ""Guest""
http://www.blogdrive.com/tagboard.html


Sue has a blogdrive BLOG, lets complain.

complain about what? she has the right to make a fool of herself.  I would never be so hypocritical as to try to get someones blog taken down when i damn sure beleive in free speech.

even if it were george bush himself i wouldnt complain. of course he'd post far too many things to entertain me!

None the less. Free speech goes both ways, fuck censoring. Fuck complaining, let the bitch HANG HERSELF. She's GOOD AT IT!


We delete spam don't we?  What is the difference between Sue's blogs and spam?  She doesn't write most of them and many are word for word duplicates...  I agree with you in principle but there are only so many spaces on google's front page.  By cross linking her blogs, and linking to her main site she not only pushes herself up google, but also pushes others down.

It isn't censorship to punish her for spamming in an effort to censor others. She is screaming louder right now and drowning us out.  We need to show that we not only have a voice, but that we speak the truth, and that will ultimately win out over her lies, no matter how many prevalent the may be.  Regardless of how that is done, the playing field needs to be equalized to prevent her marketing her "services" to others.

Sue does not give a god damn where the kids end up.  Ultimately, what matters to her is her 10% commission... And she is getting more popular, epecially with the public perception that she is some sort of "freedom fighter" or "advocate".  At the end of the day, the more popular she gets, the more kids end up in hellholes like Whitmore and Focal Point.  That needs to be stopped before it gets worse.

Let's nip this in the bud before it blooms into something much more difficult to deal with.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline webdiva

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2007, 04:57:37 PM »
Do you know how many people use 50+ blogs to post nothing but ads to make money?   I've had people use my site, you know the one, to set up one fo 50+ journals just for htat. I deleted them but the other 49 sites I emailed about back when i thought they might give a shit. They didn't care it brings them traffic, and money and most of them are for profit in one way or another. Not ONE removed the blogs i complained about.

It's wasted time for the most part that could be spent on doing something similar but with much better execution, not posting dupes everywhere etc.  Kinda like we're oding.  Most search engines will only take a few at the most copies of The same article as it is. You actually can lessen your chances by with some of these tactics but if you stick to original content and OFTEN you have a leg up at least.  
Quote from: ""psy""
Quote from: ""webdiva""
Quote from: ""Guest""
http://www.blogdrive.com/tagboard.html


Sue has a blogdrive BLOG, lets complain.

complain about what? she has the right to make a fool of herself.  I would never be so hypocritical as to try to get someones blog taken down when i damn sure beleive in free speech.

even if it were george bush himself i wouldnt complain. of course he'd post far too many things to entertain me!

None the less. Free speech goes both ways, fuck censoring. Fuck complaining, let the bitch HANG HERSELF. She's GOOD AT IT!

We delete spam don't we?  What is the difference between Sue's blogs and spam?  She doesn't write most of them and many are word for word duplicates...  I agree with you in principle but there are only so many spaces on google's front page.  By cross linking her blogs, and linking to her main site she not only pushes herself up google, but also pushes others down.

It isn't censorship to punish her for spamming in an effort to censor others. She is screaming louder right now and drowning us out.  We need to show that we not only have a voice, but that we speak the truth, and that will ultimately win out over her lies, no matter how many prevalent the may be.  Regardless of how that is done, the playing field needs to be equalized to prevent her marketing her "services" to others.

Sue does not give a god damn where the kids end up.  Ultimately, what matters to her is her 10% commission... And she is getting more popular, epecially with the public perception that she is some sort of "freedom fighter" or "advocate".  At the end of the day, the more popular she gets, the more kids end up in hellholes like Whitmore and Focal Point.  That needs to be stopped before it gets worse.

Let's nip this in the bud before it blooms into something much more difficult to deal with.


Do you know how many people use 50+ blogs to post nothing but ads to make money?   I've had people use my site, you know the one, to set up one fo 50+ journals just for htat. I deleted them but the other 49 sites I emailed about back when i thought they might give a shit. They didn't care it brings them traffic, and money and most of them are for profit in one way or another. Not ONE removed the blogs i complained about.

It's wasted time for the most part that could be spent on doing something similar but with much better execution, not posting dupes everywhere etc.  Kinda like we're doing or i thought?  I just suggest using the time we have wisely. and i didnt realize we were talkng about a blogathon with the same article on 50 blogs, although i still wouldnt' waste my time, personally. if we have enough people then fuck it go for it. not trying discourage anyone from helping out anyway they want or can.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
RIP Steve Matthews and all those we have lost along the way!

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Rep Def and SS
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2007, 05:21:15 PM »
Quote from: ""psy""
Quote from: ""webdiva""
Quote from: ""Guest""
http://www.blogdrive.com/tagboard.html


Sue has a blogdrive BLOG, lets complain.

complain about what? she has the right to make a fool of herself.  I would never be so hypocritical as to try to get someones blog taken down when i damn sure beleive in free speech.

even if it were george bush himself i wouldnt complain. of course he'd post far too many things to entertain me!

None the less. Free speech goes both ways, fuck censoring. Fuck complaining, let the bitch HANG HERSELF. She's GOOD AT IT!

We delete spam don't we?  What is the difference between Sue's blogs and spam?  She doesn't write most of them and many are word for word duplicates...  I agree with you in principle but there are only so many spaces on google's front page.  By cross linking her blogs, and linking to her main site she not only pushes herself up google, but also pushes others down.

It isn't censorship to punish her for spamming in an effort to censor others. She is screaming louder right now and drowning us out.  We need to show that we not only have a voice, but that we speak the truth, and that will ultimately win out over her lies, no matter how many prevalent the may be.  Regardless of how that is done, the playing field needs to be equalized to prevent her marketing her "services" to others.

Sue does not give a god damn where the kids end up.  Ultimately, what matters to her is her 10% commission... And she is getting more popular, epecially with the public perception that she is some sort of "freedom fighter" or "advocate".  At the end of the day, the more popular she gets, the more kids end up in hellholes like Whitmore and Focal Point.  That needs to be stopped before it gets worse.

Let's nip this in the bud before it blooms into something much more difficult to deal with.


Ideally, we'd work at both strategies: knock down the spam, and spread the truth.  I fear that the first one is harder than the second.

It can't hurt to file a grievance or two about her spamming.  

What do we have to lose?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »