Wow that was quick. Guess I should've thought about my edits before submitting. Anyway, troll -- yes. Nuiscance, yes. Paid by programs to disrupt fornits? -- probably. But still, it rubs me the wrong way to stifle free speech...
Me too... but like Guest said, Ginger doesn't ban somebody lightly... this is really a first.
I would tend to agree that he was flooding the forum, however. He impersonated survivors, he argued with himself, he insulted himself, he created drama for the sake of disruption. This wasn't a person simply disagreeing with the "popular viewpoint". He derailed at least one of my threads, as he did with many others... He accused me of things, and when I asked him to back it up, he couldn't, and changed the subject... He did that hundreds more times elsewhere. He impersonated RB. He misquoted people habitually... I could go on and on and on but there is really no point.
If you read one or two of his posts they seem credible, even rational... however, if you read an entire thread, or even a few pages, you start to see his logic break down, and his purpose unfold. In my opinion, he relies on this, knowing that few parents or casual onlookers have time for an in-depth read (or have short attention spans and no attention to detail). I, personally, didn't see what the big deal was until I tried to argue with the guy and saw how he acted when he loses an argument.