STATS.org ~ When news breaks, they fix it!

[Antigen]

Maia Szalavitz: The Media's Not Telling the Whole Oxycontin Story

Found: Sat May 12 12:16:54 2007 PDT
Webpage: http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20070511/...
Newshawk: http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/
   

Maia Szalavitz: The Media's Not Telling the Whole Oxycontin Story Maia Szalavitz: The Media's Not Telling the Whole Oxycontin Story - Yahoo! News

Most Popular

Secondary NavigationVideo Photos Opinion Local News Odd News Comics Travel Weather Full Coverage You Witness News Site Index

Search: Advanced

Opinion Maia Szalavitz: The Media's Not Telling the Whole Oxycontin Story

Maia Szalavitz Fri May 11, 5:53 PM ET

News that Purdue Pharma has been fined $600 million and some of its top executives criminally charged and fined for "misbranding" the painkiller Oxycontin has been treated with great glee by the media-- who are rightfully happy to see that sometimes corporate irresponsibility has consequences.

Unfortunately, however, in their rush to condemn Purdue as a pusher, both the media and some activists like Public Citizen are missing a huge part of the story: Oxycontin has been a wonder drug for many pain patients and contrary to their drug warrior rhetoric, virtually every case of "Oxycontin-related death" has occurred amongst addicts who mix drugs, not "innocent" pain patients.

Conventional wisdom biases the media to see the Oxycontin story as one of pill-pushing doctors and hyper-marketing drug companies turning innocent pain patients into addicts. However, this is simply not what typically happens: according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the average Oxycontin misuser (some 90%) has also taken cocaine and psychedelics.

Unless we want to believe that grandma took Oxycontin for her hip pain and therefore became a hipster, maneuvering her walker to find dealers to supply her with the coke and acid she couldn't get from her doctor, the more plausible interpretation of this finding is that pre-existing addicts are scamming doctors to get Oxycontin, rather than doctors turning patients into dope fiends. This is why Purdue won every single lawsuit filed against it for "addicting" particular patients.

As my colleague at Stats, Trevor Butterworth notes here, it was the media-- not Purdue Pharma-- that literally instructed drug users and teenagers about how to misuse Oxycontin. Purdue was actually correct to claim that long-acting opioids like Oxycontin WHEN TAKEN AS DIRECTED are less likely to lead to addiction than shorter acting medications.

But here's where the company went criminally wrong. It went on claiming that Oxycontin had lower abuse potential than other opioids after addicts had learned to defeat the time-release mechanism and make it into a more risky, shorter-acting drug. In the age of the internet, this information was bound to travel even faster than prior drug lore from user to user-- and the mainstream media ensured that even naA/ve users like teenagers would know how to make the drug more dangerous by literally demonstrating what to do on TV.

By focusing only only on the risk of addiction-- one that is less than 1% for the older people without a prior history of it who are most likely to need pain medication-- the media has done America's 20-30 million chronic pain patients a tremendous disservice. Without opioids, many cannot live productive and loving lives; why should their needs be neglected in favor of an attempt to protect others from themselves that cannot possibly succeed?

And Public Citizen-- which claims to represent patients-- should be ashamed of itself.

Its director, Sidney Wolfe, commented in the New York Times on the Purdue case, saying that ""The damage to the public from these white-collared drug pushers surely exceeds the collective damage done by traditional street drug pushers."

Oxycontin has only been on the market since 1995 and its active ingredient, oxycodone, isn't even the most commonly used prescription opioid by addicts. Only about 4% of people in treatment for addiction report prescription painkillers as their primary drug problem.

Purdue was wrong in its aggressive marketing-- but an even bigger harm is being perpetrated by the media and drug warriors who view opioids only as evil addiction-producers and deny their transformative mercy to people in pain.

http://www.drugpolicycentral.com/bot/ar ... oo5125.htm

[Anonymous]

who cares any way?

[Ursus]

who cares any way?

Anyone that has a hard time coping with some serious chronic pain, that's who.  Plus anyone who still fosters some hopeless idealism about what the media could really do for society, when it actually aims for higher than semi-tabloid standards.  And, it is yet one more example of how the so-called Drug Warriors have managed to propagate yet more hysteria re. the phenomenon of drug addiction.

It's not just corporate greed that is the culprit here, but salivating news hounds that jump on the juiciest--most likely to sell the story--bits, rather than present a balanced perspective of the whole story and its context.

By focusing only on the risk of addiction-- one that is less than 1% for the older people without a prior history of it who are most likely to need pain medication-- the media has done America's 20-30 million chronic pain patients a tremendous disservice. Without opioids, many cannot live productive and loving lives; why should their needs be neglected in favor of an attempt to protect others from themselves that cannot possibly succeed?

...Purdue was wrong in its aggressive marketing--but an even bigger harm is being perpetrated by the media and drug warriors who view opioids only as evil addiction-producers and deny their transformative mercy to people in pain.

[Antigen]

Anybody who's had a child w/ serious medical problems requiring surgery who has had to beg, plead and make promises to get the kid out of the toxic institutional setting WITH adequate pain meds. Any pain management doctor who feels for these kids but who's scared shitless of losing their license or hosital rights if they run afoul of the stupid assed cops, judges and DAS who think they can solve peoples drug problems with threats of incarceration.

I know, I know, most people are to stupid to know they should care. That's daunting. But wtt, mate? Does it bother you that some folk are trying to slap them upside the head and make them understand that this does effect them?