::hehehmm:: And to think somebody who spent that first evening with you responds to this thread.Remembering that night,you sort of had a look on your face like"Oh Shit,here I am now,what do I do?"
Yeah, to the best of my memory, that is exactly how I felt...."What do I do now?"...Of course the first answer I got cummultively, was to just be honest. After all honesty was the first and most important rule. Yet it wasn't until much later that I relized that honesty was the best policy for the dishonest man.
And it is odd to have all these memories and to be able to connect withone of the first faces I connected with...Sam Kinison. I never really had any ill will towards (Sam). I was real lucky or at least I felt that way. For some reason, unbekownwst to me, I trusted SAM. I remember vaquely going over the rules (with him), yet I difinately recall that they were explained in such a way as to imply, "this is how you will survive here". Because I had no real idea how to survive the absurdity of the situation, I kinda clung to those rules of acting/behaving...I mean still there was a revulsion to comply, but there was also a practical issue of survival. It was difficult to be sure!
My first Old Comer, whose name I forget, SAM knows, spilt or was pulled afer one or to nights that I was at his house, (which is still standing). SAM and I believe went to diferent homes, if memory serves me correctly. This was my introduction to the Can*trel home. Lu*is and Lan*ce Can*trel were another set of guys that had genuinly good natures about them.
Aside from Straight, it's rhetoric and its bullshit, this family genuinly welcomed me into thier home. I don't recall that heavy, Straight talk didn't really occur. Minimal time spent on MI's and such, we had private baths/showers and treated with dignity by the family.
I found out that Lu*is the older of the two brothers was susceptible to wee bit of obssesive compulsive behavor. All it took was the mear mention of hearing his breaths s he fell asleep and then he would get extremely aggitated and begin counting his breathe, each inhil and exhale...thus lossing a night of sleep....because we would interupt him about ever 150 breaths.
I coasted there for months 8-9 months to be a lil more accurate. As odd as it sounds, I felt perfectly at home there, it was a perfect refuge from the 9-9 thing. Plus I had no desire to return home at all, even with the consderation of more comfortable surrounding, beach etc. 85DJ entered the same house hold at or the same time I did, he has a prety good idea of the miliue(sp) of the house hold.
I quess one of the reasons I am sorta looking at the "fun times" or (gawd forbide I say it) "good times" I experiencedin Straight Inc isbecause I am investagating 'hunch' I mentioned in an earlier post...not sure of the thread (A.D.D and all)
In the post I brought about a question to folks wondering about the connection to Straight Inc to Stockhol Syndrom. My first serch result brought me to this page
http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome which is the Wikipedi Site. a snippet of its difinition includes :
The Stockholm syndrome is a psychological response sometimes seen in an abducted hostage, in which the hostage exhibits loyalty to the hostage-taker, in spite of the danger (or at least risk) in which the hostage has been placed. Stockholm syndrome is also sometimes discussed in reference to other situations with similar tensions, such as battered person syndrome, rape cases, child abuse cases, and bride kidnapping.An narrower deffinition by Medcine net.com
http://http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=24038cal it "
An extraordinary phenomenon in which a hostage begins to identify with and grow sympathetic to their captor"
A Yahoo page refelcts here
http://http://ask.yahoo.com/20030324.htmlCaptives begin to identify with their captors initially as a defensive mechanism, out of fear of violence. Small acts of kindness by the captor are magnified, since finding perspective in a hostage situation is by definition impossible. Rescue attempts are also seen as a threat, since it's likely the captive would be injured during such attempts.
It's important to note that these symptoms occur under tremendous emotional and often physical duress. The behavior is considered a common survival strategy for victims of interpersonal abuse, and has been observed in battered spouses, abused children, prisoners of war, and concentration camp survivors. Answers.com says in regard to Stockholm Syndrom....
A phenomenon in which a hostage begins to identify with and grow sympathetic to his or her captor.As Answers.com another vast majoity of medical type definition databses simply define it as...
A phenomenon in which a hostage begins to identify with and grow sympathetic to his or her captor. Of course this, I wonder, might this be a
reason or an
explination...an answer to many questions those of us have abut ourselves, that endured the entirity of Straight Inc. Not to dismiss those that did not complete the "program". I got lotsa love for those that were sucessful in finding thier way out.
I heard 12,000 children succefully completed Straight Inc. Staistically I am one of those and I resent that status on many many levels.
I have enuff information to prove to myself there is a direct link between Straight Inc and Stockholm Syndrom. A quick Google Search will I think give a thinking person the ability to connect the dots...guess my next logical query is Stockholm Syndrome + Symptomology
