I dont get why this was banned in the US. Did the company responsible threaten to sue?
You know about file sharing, and the stink that the record industry was raising anyway. Well the Republicans went ahead and promoted corporations to police status and, with the DCMA, allowed corportations who feel their copyrights were violated, to hand out subpoenas of their own.
Keep in mind that Landmark doesn't own the copyright to the documentary. But since corporations now have police status, they can throw around subpoenas regardless of the evidence. They just have to claim their copyrights were violated. Google, YouTube, and the internet archive, with no spines of their own, happily bent over and took the videos down. Landmark withdrew their subpoena only after they original poster agreed not to ever post that video online again.
Why did they do this? Because the video was so damning for them that it resulted in the government shutting them down in France, as well as elsewhere in Europe. Journalists, and free speech, gave Landmark a great big boot in the ass.... Overseas at least.
When they passed the DMCA i just knew this was going to happen.... I knew it... Give corporations an inch... I don't know what is worse, government or corporate censorship... Landmark got their way essentially. Part 1 is on the net but part 2 etc...?