Author Topic: 100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas  (Read 3543 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2007, 12:18:09 AM »
Quote from: ""Cassandra""
Why, isn't imitation the purest form of flattery? Who wouldn't want to imitate the Toker, after all? Anyway....

Breaking News! This just in from the fast paced, exciting PM circuit!

Quote from: ""Charly""
I thought I asked very politely and appropriately.  I appreciate the editing.  The post has now been re-published as a Thread called:

100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas

I would appreciate the editing of that as well, as it appears to be also TOKER.

Thank you very much and I do appreciate it.  I do not know all the intricacies of IP addresses, proxies etc., and I know it must be a pain to have to sort through all of that, so I do thank you for your time and attention.

I was asked by several folks to discuss Carlbrook, which is why I came back to the forum.  It didn't work out, so my intent is to not post anymore and not stir things up.  


Karen

That's probably a wise choice, because your argument can't stand up without the props provided by a relatively tightly controlled dialog.

Which brings me to the point of culpability and the practical means to control the dialog. Essentially, you can't. Neither can I. Know what happens when you try to censor and control a dialog on the net? http://www.angelfire.com/ultra/ph_ck_elan_school/

Oh well, I told `em so, but they just wouldn't listen! So the Fornits Elan site is now worthless, but it's like the magician's apprentice breaking the errant enchanted mop, dozens of sites have sprung up to meet the demand.

The net responds to censorship like damage and routes around it.

So.... you'll have to start all over again with a whole new anon poster. This time it probably won't go the way you want, though, because the person has already demonstrated an unwillingness to meet your demands by saving and reposting the message that's got up under your saddle blanket (or beach blanket, as it were.... snickers!)

I think either they don't like you're trying to control other people, they just enjoy irritating you or they're trying to angle me into a position of responsibility of which I am currently, blissfully free. ROFLMAO! Fuck you, I don't cow down to bullies! Your very favorite people in the world tried pretty hard to bully me years ago, and believe me they give SO much better than you possibly can!



HI iM Curious as to what has made the fornits elan site worthless. Did something new happen or is it just that staff flood the site with confusion and scatalogical comments?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2007, 12:27:17 AM »
who me? no hardly

I know about Elan and what goes on there- and that it is the sickest of all the schools just in terms of sheer formalized sadism and it always seemed a shame the forum was going to waste.

If kids go to the police ..i dont see how these people can stay out of jail
amd elan forum would be a great way to make former kids go to the police
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2007, 12:35:55 AM »
Well, it's like this. Matt has a life and no time or need to focus on Elan anymore than he ever did. So when Mike asked to moderate it I asked Matt he said 'shur' cause he's spent a lot of time in the great NW and so it went.

Being a moderated forum w/ no real expectation of privacy, anonymity or freedom, it became a boring conversation. Being that it was a boring conversation, all the interesting people bounced off and carried on the interesting conversations in other venues. That's how it goes, that is what is meant by "The internet views censorship as damage and routes around it". It's pretty intuitive if you stop to think about it for just a minute. Same could be said of 6th graders. That's how the high art of note folding and passing evolved, isn't it?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #18 on: January 11, 2007, 01:15:31 AM »
so the elan forum is "moderated" now? I cant tell the difference..the last post was about "fART" and other  irrelevence, which is pretty much what all the posts have always been about -except those way -way back

I cant imagine anyone interesting thinking "gee not enough talk about butt sex" and leaving. We still have anonymity i think..just make up a name when you post a topic. (Like at cedu forum right?)

It wasnt very interesting- (except to enthusiasts of German porn?)And not very useful as a rallying point.

Maybe the interesting people went away cause it got so sophmorically irrelevent in there. Im sure that ws the intention of the spammers
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Nihilanthic

  • Posts: 3931
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #19 on: January 11, 2007, 08:47:30 AM »
Quote
I cant imagine anyone interesting thinking "gee not enough talk about butt sex" and leaving.


 :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
DannyB on the internet:I CALLED A LAWYER TODAY TO SEE IF I COULD SUE YOUR ASSES FOR DOING THIS BUT THAT WAS NOT POSSIBLE.

CCMGirl on program restraints: "DON\'T TAZ ME BRO!!!!!"

TheWho on program survivors: "From where I sit I see all the anit-program[sic] people doing all the complaining and crying."

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #20 on: January 11, 2007, 10:27:17 AM »
Quote
Maybe the interesting people went away cause it got so sophmorically irrelevent in there. Im sure that ws the intention of the spammers

It's funny how people will always jump to this conclusion. What makes you so damn sure that was their intention? Fucking paranoid geek! ((LOL)) You've ruled out clowning around for the sake of clowning around, with no "ulterior motive."

Maybe they got tired of people trying to sound intelligent by using words like "sophomorically," which you misspelled, btw. :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #21 on: January 11, 2007, 12:36:28 PM »
Quote from: ""Charly""
I thought I asked very politely and appropriately.  I appreciate the editing.  The post has now been re-published as a Thread called:

100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas

I would appreciate the editing of that as well, as it appears to be also TOKER.

Thank you very much and I do appreciate it.  I do not know all the intricacies of IP addresses, proxies etc., and I know it must be a pain to have to sort through all of that, so I do thank you for your time and attention.

I was asked by several folks to discuss Carlbrook, which is why I came back to the forum.  It didn't work out, so my intent is to not post anymore and not stir things up.  


Karen


What was this supposedly slanderous post?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #22 on: January 11, 2007, 01:42:10 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Charly""
I thought I asked very politely and appropriately.  I appreciate the editing.  The post has now been re-published as a Thread called:

100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas

I would appreciate the editing of that as well, as it appears to be also TOKER.

Thank you very much and I do appreciate it.  I do not know all the intricacies of IP addresses, proxies etc., and I know it must be a pain to have to sort through all of that, so I do thank you for your time and attention.

I was asked by several folks to discuss Carlbrook, which is why I came back to the forum.  It didn't work out, so my intent is to not post anymore and not stir things up.  


Karen

What was this supposedly slanderous post?

No that was a PM.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #23 on: January 11, 2007, 01:46:44 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Charly""
I thought I asked very politely and appropriately.  I appreciate the editing.  The post has now been re-published as a Thread called:

100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas

I would appreciate the editing of that as well, as it appears to be also TOKER.

Thank you very much and I do appreciate it.  I do not know all the intricacies of IP addresses, proxies etc., and I know it must be a pain to have to sort through all of that, so I do thank you for your time and attention.

I was asked by several folks to discuss Carlbrook, which is why I came back to the forum.  It didn't work out, so my intent is to not post anymore and not stir things up.  


Karen

What was this supposedly slanderous post?
No that was a PM.


Yes, I can see that.  I'm asking what the supposedly libelous or slanderous post was.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #24 on: January 11, 2007, 01:55:32 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Yes, I can see that.  I'm asking what the supposedly libelous or slanderous post was.

Whose?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #25 on: January 11, 2007, 01:56:57 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Guest""
Yes, I can see that.  I'm asking what the supposedly libelous or slanderous post was.
Whose?


The one Karen made Robert edit.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
100% unblemished, unvarnished TRUTH about KarenInDallas
« Reply #26 on: January 11, 2007, 01:58:51 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Guest""
Yes, I can see that.  I'm asking what the supposedly libelous or slanderous post was.
Whose?

The one Karen made Robert edit.

Oh, ok. All I know is that it's somewhere in the OP.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »