Yeh, I'm sure some see it that way.
Imagine an infant being like a brand new computer, with a basic operating system, with relatively unlimited potential. Everything that children witnesses, everything said or done to her is like the installation of software. Every person that passes through her life can install a postive/useful or negative/hurtful piece of software. Once installed it can be extremely difficult to remove or replace it.
Look around and find a peaceful, cooperative, confident, passionate child and observe their household. Find an aggressive, obstinant, insecure, subdued or anxious child and observe their household. Their 'programmers' will be very different. Children learn what they live.
Indoctrination is not inherently a bad word, it means to teach. It's how the teaching is done. The problem with programs is that there is little to no genuine teaching (modeling, guiding, setting reasonable limits). Kids are punished until they conform or die.
Brainwashing however, is "a
forcible indoctrination to induce someone to give up basic political, social, or religious beliefs and attitudes and to accept contrasting regimented ideas".
And, forcible is not always ugly and painful.
Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.... Their very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level with those who have not yet reached the age of reason.
~~C. S. LEWIS (English writer), "The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment," God in the Dock, 1970
Related:
http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.ph ... ault#60716http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.ph ... ault#32242