« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC  (Read 12593 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2006, 02:23:18 PM »
Remember the OJ civil case??????

HUH?

Civil case is a whole different ball game!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2006, 02:25:09 PM »
Think the Suds will "settle this civil case" rather than agree to the depositions?
Think the Suds really want to subject themeselves to depostions?
Think they really want to answer all those deposition questions?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #32 on: September 22, 2006, 02:48:28 PM »
they will definitely settle.  mark my words.

i called the criminal trial exactly.  this WILL settle and for big bucks.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #33 on: September 22, 2006, 02:59:39 PM »
AGREED!

The Suds will have that insurance company paying up!
The Suds wouldn't dare answer any depo questions!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #34 on: September 22, 2006, 03:04:28 PM »
that's right.  they will not put anything in writing or testify under oath.

the insurance company will cough it up.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #35 on: September 23, 2006, 12:57:55 AM »
If Cheryl Sudweeks's charges are significant enough to warrant a "lifetime ban" from operating a facility in Juab County, then what  makes her any more "fit" to provide any type of child-caring services in any other county in the State of Utah?

That's a question that needs to be answered.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #36 on: September 23, 2006, 01:11:15 AM »
To the colorful, poster:

Not every child enrolled at Whitmore was proclaimed to be a "self-destructive, manipulative, liar."

Most were enrolled to participate in the Sudweeks's advertised fine, accredited, educational program, horse equine program, extensive travel opportunities, which offered individual and group therapy by a licensed therapist.in a loving, non-abusive setting...as was assured by Sue Scheff /PURE who referred each parent and child.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #37 on: September 23, 2006, 01:16:27 AM »
Wonder what this poster finds "OTHER FUN STUFF" about children testifying about abuses they suffered at the hands of the Whitmore owners, Mark and Cheryl Sudweeks?

It's one thing to defend the Sudweeks, if that is what one wants to do.   But that is just sick.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline BuzzKill

  • Posts: 1815
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #38 on: September 23, 2006, 04:44:14 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
To the colorful, poster:

Not every child enrolled at Whitmore was proclaimed to be a "self-destructive, manipulative, liar."

Most were enrolled to participate in the Sudweeks's advertised fine, accredited, educational program, horse equine program, extensive travel opportunities, which offered individual and group therapy by a licensed therapist.in a loving, non-abusive setting...as was assured by Sue Scheff /PURE who referred each parent and child.


What they said - plus this: If the Salt Lake City jury is any indication, Utah Juries are up set and offended by persistent and consistent allegations of abuse against those who have been entrusted with the care of troubled and fragile children.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #39 on: September 23, 2006, 06:30:45 PM »
I'll guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens. Should be interesting.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #40 on: September 23, 2006, 08:15:38 PM »
Quote from: ""BuzzKill""
If the Salt Lake City jury is any indication, Utah Juries are up set and offended by persistent and consistent allegations of abuse against those who have been entrusted with the care of troubled and fragile children.


SLC is way different from most of Mormon Utah. A lot of them don't even understand what child abuse really is. Why do you think there's so much of this shit in Utah?

Here's hoping for some GUILTY.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #41 on: September 24, 2006, 02:49:03 AM »
i am like God, and God like me. I am as large as God, He is as small as I. He cannot above me, nor I beneath Him be.
................


jury trial for sure........simple it is.................give your depo gorilla............public words to live by..............BUY BUY......
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #42 on: September 25, 2006, 12:40:19 PM »
Quote from: ""BuzzKill""
What they said - plus this: If the Salt Lake City jury is any indication, Utah Juries are up set and offended by persistent and consistent allegations of abuse against those who have been entrusted with the care of troubled and fragile children.

Quote from: ""Milk Gargling Death Penal""
SLC is way different from most of Mormon Utah. A lot of them don't even understand what child abuse really is. Why do you think there's so much of this shit in Utah?
Here's hoping for some GUILTY.

Quote from: ""Three Springs Waygookin""
SLC is under fifty percent mormon. The percentages are in favor of the jury being less inclined to vote not guilty based on religion.


[/b]
:wstupid:  ::bigsmilebounce::  :wave:

[/b]

Here's an article from the the Loyola of Los Angeles Law School Law Review that you scholars might enjoy - I know, I know, I know - it's 29 pages long and it has some big words and no pictures, but you can try, right??

http://llr.lls.edu/volumes/v34-issue2/l ... 20trial%22
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #43 on: September 25, 2006, 07:20:53 PM »
Guess it is "wait and see" huh?

No one seems too bothered about a jury trial execept whoever this is yakking for the Suds's benefit.

Let the jury hear the testimony, and let the jury decide.
That is what the JUSTICE system is about.

Still say the Suds will never give those depositions, and go on record: they will be yelling "settlement" to the top of their sorry lungs.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #44 on: September 25, 2006, 07:22:27 PM »
Thought the civil case had been filed in Provo, not that it matters.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »