« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC  (Read 12595 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2006, 01:44:53 PM »
Yeah, I read that back in 04.  I believe the kids that were abused and I'm laughing my ASS off at Cheryl and the tiny handful of blind devotees she's got.


 :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2006, 02:52:32 PM »
The people who don't believe her no doubt have ulterior motives for proclaiming their allegations of abuse. And I'd say that you could apply that "small handful" comment to yourself and a few others here in the opposite sense.  :roll:

Have a nice day. :wave:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2006, 03:14:54 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
FUCK YOU CHERYL YOU CHILD ABUSING, SCUM SUCKING, WHORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[/color]

Typical impotent rage coming from someone with no credibility. Get a life.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #18 on: September 21, 2006, 03:36:50 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Quote from: ""Guest""
FUCK YOU CHERYL YOU CHILD ABUSING, SCUM SUCKING, WHORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[/color]
Typical impotent rage coming from someone with no credibility. Get a life.

Well said.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2006, 05:29:02 PM »
Screw your twisted sense of credibility.  She fucking PLED OUT asshole.


GUILTY AS CHARGED!!!!!!!!


 :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2006, 05:30:03 PM »
Oh well. So much for trolling this thread. Dammit.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2006, 10:34:16 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Screw your twisted sense of credibility.  She fucking PLED OUT asshole.


GUILTY AS CHARGED!!!!!!!!


 :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:

Guilty as charged??  That's not what the paper reported - do you have some inside information that the court wasn't aware of???" :wstupid: If not, you appear to have a serious reading problem  ::deal:: - ohhh. . .is that Cheryl's fault too??? . . .  and. . .  speaking of credibility issues - what exactly was it that the prosecutor had to say about the credibility of the so-called "victims"????[/color]

"Earlier this week, Sudweeks entered a [/color][/u][/size] plea to four counts of [/b] hazing, a class C misdemeanor."[/b][/size]

"Juab County Attorney Jared Eldridge acknowledged that parents of the alleged victims are unhappy and feel "abandoned" by the system.
    Sudweeks was [/u]originally charged with five misdemeanor counts of child abuse and two counts of hazing[/color][/b] for allegedly humiliating and physically harming four children under her care in 2003 and 2004.
Eldridge stands by those charges, but said he feared a jury trial would have exposed [/color]credibility problems[/color][/b][/u] with witnesses. ::bangin::
    "This was the best deal we could get," said Eldridge. "It was a struggle for me. But I told the families that I have to live in reality." [/b]   **(Apparently most of the people on this website haven't quite caught on to that concept.)**[/b]

    "There is nothing preventing Mark Sudweeks from opening another school. And if in a year, Cheryl Sudweeks clears her name, she too will be free to open a youth program outside of Juab County under state Human Services Licensing rules."

[/b]Charge 1 - 76-5-107.5 - ATTEMPTED HAZING Class A Misdemeanor
         (amended) to Class C Misdemeanor                              
             Plea: September 18, 2006 No Contest                        
             Disposition: September 18, 2006 Plea in abeyance          
         Charge 2 - 76-5-107.5 - ATTEMPTED HAZING Class A Misdemeanor
         (amended) to Class C Misdemeanor                              
             Plea: September 18, 2006 No Contest                        
             Disposition: September 18, 2006 Plea in abeyance          
         Charge 3 - 76-5-107.5 - ATTEMPTED HAZING Class A Misdemeanor
         (amended) to Class C Misdemeanor                              
             Plea: September 18, 2006 No Contest                        
             Disposition: September 18, 2006 Plea in abeyance          
         Charge 4 - 76-5-107.5 - ATTEMPTED HAZING Class A Misdemeanor
         (amended) to Class C Misdemeanor                              
             Plea: September 18, 2006 No Contest
             Disposition: September 18, 2006 Plea in abeyance[/quote][/color][/b]
  :wave:  ::bigsmilebounce::  ::deal::  ::rocker::

hmmmmmm. . .. wonder if those pesky "witness credibilty problems" might be a teeny little bit of a concern in the civil case???? [/color]

 ::bangin::  :scared:  ::ftard::  ::boohoo::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2006, 10:57:51 PM »
The Suds have been "devastated financially and emotionally.....by the now-defunct Whitmore Academy...and the historic mansion is  up for sale"?

OH, how very very sad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Poor, poor Suds.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2006, 11:04:06 PM »
"Minor scuffles with the law before  for animal neglect in Canada"?

What's MINOR about Mark Sudweeks being found guilty of FELON animal abuse, and being fined over $100,000, and being BANNED from owning animals in Canada for life?  

Read the transcript:  Regina vs Sudweeks
It is public record and available on the internet.

Canada and Mexico got it right.
As usual, Utah got it wrong~!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #24 on: September 21, 2006, 11:12:11 PM »
Was he fuckin' chickens up the ass? They've got those tight little assholes.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #25 on: September 21, 2006, 11:19:07 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Was he fuckin' chickens up the ass? They've got those tight little assholes.

 :rofl:   ::bwahaha::  ::bwahaha2::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #26 on: September 21, 2006, 11:19:28 PM »
What the hell is "Attempted" Hazing.
Would someone actually sue for that?
Does that imply that she "attempted" to abuse someone but was somehow prevented?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #27 on: September 21, 2006, 11:36:30 PM »
Wouldn't worry about a "credibility issue" in the civil case.
This case WILL BE HEARD BY A JURY....and that's the difference.

Eldridge didn't ALLOW a jury to hear the criminal case.
You'll have to ask him why, and what "reality" it is that he's living in.


Let's just wait and see what a jury has to say when they hear the witness, and the Sudweeks testify. My money's on the victim's credibility--not some woman who has already "copped a plea."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #28 on: September 22, 2006, 01:00:31 PM »
Quote from: ""Guest""
Wouldn't worry about a "credibility issue" in the civil case.
This case WILL BE HEARD BY A JURY....and that's the difference.

Eldridge didn't ALLOW a jury to hear the criminal case.
You'll have to ask him why, and what "reality" it is that he's living in.


Let's just wait and see what a jury has to say when they hear the witness, and the Sudweeks testify. My money's on the victim's credibility--not some woman who has already "copped a plea."


And[/b][/b]
:o  ::deal::

[/b]

"These kids made some allegations of abuse and I completely believe them. That's why I filed the case.  But the fact that I believe them is one thing, whether a jury is going to believe is a whole different question,"[/b]  Juab County Attorney Jared Eldridge said."[/b]

[/b]
 ::bwahaha::  ::bigsmilebounce::  ::bwahaha::  ::rocker::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
ACTION ALERT POSTED ON ISAC
« Reply #29 on: September 22, 2006, 02:19:26 PM »
A jury is made up of people.  The jury will get to hear the testimony.

Why all the yak, yak yak.

It will go to trial, and the jury will get to listen to both sides, and make their decision.
Simple as that.

That is why there is the court system.

The Sudweeks are scheduled to give their depositions.
Seems like everyone is DOING THIER JOBS.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »