Load Wadbury circles the wagons of censorship to cover up his family's bad deeds...
Terry_MO
Junior Member
Member # 5232
posted October 02, 2006 03:23 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When a xxxx escort drugged and raped a girl, Denise Woodberry was the Boundary County Prosecuting Attorney. Though the rapist, Armstrong, was clearly guilty. He was not prosecuted by Woodberry, why?
I read about this case it was proven that he did the crime why no prosicution?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 5 | From: Missouri | Registered: Jul 2006 | Logged: 24.216.122.200 |
exhausted
Member
Member # 5259
posted October 02, 2006 04:04 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I do know it is extremely difficult to prove rape, often the victim showers or delays seeking medical help - often the assailant will admit to intercourse but argues she (or he) consented, it's up to the girl to prove otherwise, when two people are having sex, there's rarely anyone else around, so it's her word against his
This is why so many rapes go unreprted, the system sucks big time and very little sympathy is given to the victim, that works both ways, here in the UK a man has just served 5 years for a rape he did not commit, the young lady in question is a serial 'rape crier' it's a real shame there are ppl like her about because she has ruined this mans life - it doesn't matter if he gets an honourable pardon, the seed of doubt has been sewn and others will always be apprehensive of him 'just in case'
You will never get the full details of what happened to this girl, or what happened during the case to cause this outcome...it's sad, but unfortunately not uncommon
It makes you angry inside I know.....
--------------------
Help help help help help ......
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 50 | From: United Kingdom | Registered: Sep 2006 | Logged: 84.68.95.220 |
WillieNelson
Member
Member # 5254
posted October 02, 2006 04:54 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Without having all the evidence, it is hard to tell if someone is clearly guilty, as you state. Perhaps he was, but perhaps the prosecuting attorney had information that was not revealed in the press or reports.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 16 | From: Way up north | Registered: Aug 2006 | Logged: 68.154.188.175 |
Lon
Administrator
Member # 53
posted October 02, 2006 08:58 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Terry_MO:
You seem to consistently bring up these old half-truths. In this case the facts are:
1. The "girl" in question was middle age, about Armstrong's age, and working as an escort with Armstrong.
2. They had been living together for some time.
3. She filed a civil case against Armstrong.
4. The local police investigated to see if any crime had been committed.
5. The "girl" refused to cooperate with the police so they could not make a recommendation to the prosecutor Denise Woodbury.
6. A prosecutor can only take action if there is an investigation and recommendation by the police.
7. It was largely a contract dispute, with rape and drugging issues thrown in.
8. The jury came out in favor of the "girl".
9. The attorney for her never contacted the Boundary County prosecutor nor made any move to make this a criminal issue.
10. The attorney for her later was convicted of a felony, indicating his ethics might have been challenged.
I am closing this thread off from further discussion.
Lon
Board Owner
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 480 | From: Bonners Ferry, ID | Registered: Aug 1998 | Logged: 67.142.130.37 |
Load, you're such a tool. It's not enough for you to rebut, you have to silence any response to your rebuttal. You, Wadbury, are a fucking disgrace.
