Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Hyde Schools
Scary Larry back on campus!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ursus:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---I imagine that the sheer number of pages this thread contains may well be daunting, but this thread, among a few others, contains quite a lot of material not just about Larry's sexual proclivities, but also those of a number of other former Hyde faculty, etc, and is well worth the reading time invested.
To summarize re. your question: Larry was a former Hyde student in the mid 70s who married another former Hyde student (Donna) and who both returned to teach at Hyde. Several of the current Hyde administration knew Larry as a student, and some knew Donna as well, as some of them were students around the same time.
Larry was... shall we say... a bit too liberal in translating his "affections" for the (female) students into physical channels... He was also in charge of the Dean's Area, and hence privy to student's required confessions of their sexual misadventures and transgressions, which he apparently took great satisfaction in hearing out in a most "thorough" manner.
Hyde was well aware of this problem, as there had been complaints from students for years. Eventually, as Hyde never did anything save make these girls feel pretty shitty for even opening their mouths about such a thing, one of the parents sued re. the sexual assault of their daughter.
Apparently Hyde still did not see fit to alter Larry's circumstances, hoping that Larry "taking some time off to think about things" should suffice. However, Donna is still employed at Hyde, and least two (I believe) of their kids still attend Hyde, so Hyde rationalizes that Larry's involvement with the Hyde community is necessary for "family reasons." It is my understanding that the Dubinskys live in faculty housing, on or extremely close to the Woodstock campus.
--- End quote ---
How could Hyde take the risk of having someone like this on campus? They must be out of their minds taking on this liability
--- End quote ---
Not exactly novel behavior on their part.
lucy:
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---I imagine that the sheer number of pages this thread contains may well be daunting, but this thread, among a few others, contains quite a lot of material not just about Larry's sexual proclivities, but also those of a number of other former Hyde faculty, etc, and is well worth the reading time invested.
To summarize re. your question: Larry was a former Hyde student in the mid 70s who married another former Hyde student (Donna) and who both returned to teach at Hyde. Several of the current Hyde administration knew Larry as a student, and some knew Donna as well, as some of them were students around the same time.
Larry was... shall we say... a bit too liberal in translating his "affections" for the (female) students into physical channels... He was also in charge of the Dean's Area, and hence privy to student's required confessions of their sexual misadventures and transgressions, which he apparently took great satisfaction in hearing out in a most "thorough" manner.
Hyde was well aware of this problem, as there had been complaints from students for years. Eventually, as Hyde never did anything save make these girls feel pretty shitty for even opening their mouths about such a thing, one of the parents sued re. the sexual assault of their daughter.
Apparently Hyde still did not see fit to alter Larry's circumstances, hoping that Larry "taking some time off to think about things" should suffice. However, Donna is still employed at Hyde, and least two (I believe) of their kids still attend Hyde, so Hyde rationalizes that Larry's involvement with the Hyde community is necessary for "family reasons." It is my understanding that the Dubinskys live in faculty housing, on or extremely close to the Woodstock campus.
--- End quote ---
How could Hyde take the risk of having someone like this on campus? They must be out of their minds taking on this liability
--- End quote ---
Not exactly novel behavior on their part.
--- End quote ---
How could Hyde take the risk? Very easy answer. Number one, Hyde's arrogance is beyond anything you have ever experienced, and number two there are always desperate parents out there who play into all this B.S. and are weak enough to worship J Gauld. Most every adult who is involved with Hyde has deep deep issues even after spending years and years at Hyde. Truth is, that none of them ever truly "get it" or they would move on!!
Ursus:
--- Quote from: ""lucy"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""Ursus"" ---I imagine that the sheer number of pages this thread contains may well be daunting, but this thread, among a few others, contains quite a lot of material not just about Larry's sexual proclivities, but also those of a number of other former Hyde faculty, etc, and is well worth the reading time invested.
To summarize re. your question: Larry was a former Hyde student in the mid 70s who married another former Hyde student (Donna) and who both returned to teach at Hyde. Several of the current Hyde administration knew Larry as a student, and some knew Donna as well, as some of them were students around the same time.
Larry was... shall we say... a bit too liberal in translating his "affections" for the (female) students into physical channels... He was also in charge of the Dean's Area, and hence privy to student's required confessions of their sexual misadventures and transgressions, which he apparently took great satisfaction in hearing out in a most "thorough" manner.
Hyde was well aware of this problem, as there had been complaints from students for years. Eventually, as Hyde never did anything save make these girls feel pretty shitty for even opening their mouths about such a thing, one of the parents sued re. the sexual assault of their daughter.
Apparently Hyde still did not see fit to alter Larry's circumstances, hoping that Larry "taking some time off to think about things" should suffice. However, Donna is still employed at Hyde, and least two (I believe) of their kids still attend Hyde, so Hyde rationalizes that Larry's involvement with the Hyde community is necessary for "family reasons." It is my understanding that the Dubinskys live in faculty housing, on or extremely close to the Woodstock campus.
--- End quote ---
How could Hyde take the risk of having someone like this on campus? They must be out of their minds taking on this liability
--- End quote ---
Not exactly novel behavior on their part.
--- End quote ---
How could Hyde take the risk? Very easy answer. Number one, Hyde's arrogance is beyond anything you have ever experienced, and number two there are always desperate parents out there who play into all this B.S. and are weak enough to worship J Gauld. Most every adult who is involved with Hyde has deep deep issues even after spending years and years at Hyde. Truth is, that none of them ever truly "get it" or they would move on!!
--- End quote ---
Those that "get it" do move on, often with much attendant frustration and disillusion. For despite Hyde's avowed ideals, the reality bears little resemblance to these laudable goals.
The reality, in fact, bears a great deal more resemblance to the old "reign in the errant youth and control their wayward behavior" of reform schools in the past, and was, in fact and not surprisingly, how Hyde was started in the first place! Perhaps this makes the hypocritical smearing on of a so-called "character-based" facade all the more distasteful and insulting. Let's just call a spade a spade, Hyde, and not a fancy schmancy available-to-members-only silverplated name-brand shovel! Both might serve well for the purposes of dispensing all the bullshit laid around there, but the former would be a hell of a lot of honest, eh?
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""lucy"" ---Most every adult who is involved with Hyde has deep deep issues even after spending years and years at Hyde.
--- End quote ---
Most any human being who has spent a significant chunk of time at Hyde will have deep deep issues, whether or not they had them prior to their "life-changing experience."
Anonymous:
--- Quote from: ""Guest"" ---
--- Quote from: ""lucy"" ---Most every adult who is involved with Hyde has deep deep issues even after spending years and years at Hyde.
--- End quote ---
Most any human being who has spent a significant chunk of time at Hyde will have deep deep issues, whether or not they had them prior to their "life-changing experience."
--- End quote ---
I am starting a self help group Hyde Alums Anonymous:
1) We admit we are powerless over Joe and our lives have become unmanageable
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version