Scary Larry back on campus!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

I recently was alerted to Larry Dubinsky being around campus again through this website.  I checked out the link to the Hyde Newsletter and see there is a notice about Donna and Larry's remarriage.  I also saw the picture of Dubinsky in the Hyde Newsletter with the notice that they remarried at the "Hyde Mansion."

Can you please tell me how Hyde can justify keeping Dubinsky  close to the student body and to the Administration after the many years of complaints by female students?  Does Hyde need to see him feeling up one of the girls with their own eyes in order to believe all the many complaints about him?

Get wise Hyde!

[Anonymous]

I too do not know how Hyde would subject themselves to the liability by having a known pedepile on their campus.

Dubinsky should not be allowed within 10 feet of the Hyde Campus.  They say because of the past incidences along with the lawsuit against the school several years ago, he won't ever be a full time staff member, but this leaves open the door for other involvements at the school.  I was told he helped coach a female sports team last year and is around campus quite often as the husband  of a faculty member and parent of a student,

This involvement at the school allows Dubinsky to continue to engage in inappropriate behavior towards females and would not be accepted under any circumstances at a reputable school..  You are right about the liability issue.  Hyde is opening itself up to many lawsuits with this known problem.  They have a responsibility to the rest of the student body and yet seem to overlook this.

As a professional I highly advise Hyde to keep Dubinsky away from their female population.  They know it, they are aware of it, and if they chose to ignore all the warning signs then they open themselves up to future lawsuits of a magnitude they might not be ready for.

[Anonymous]

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:31 am     Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
It's not very nice to keep a perv around who settled a case for sexual harassment against a female student. Not nice to pretend that nothing ever happened. Not nice to not inform the parents that this guy who SETTLED the suit and then was forced to resign is still hanging around campus all the time to 'visit his ex-wife and child'.
 
Back to top      
 
 Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:02 pm     Post subject:    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
It was the school that settled the case, not the perv, but it is true that he is around campus all the time. He lives in Hyde housing with his wife who is a teacher there. They had gotten divorced but are now remarried. You can read all about it in the Hyde Newsletter.

Hyde hosted the wedding of this PERVERT. What does that tell you about how serious Hyde takes sexual harassment complaints? If someone tries to infer that this was a one time incident, do not believe them. There were complaints for years about this Perv. It was brought to the schools attention after the lawsuit also, but their attitude seems to be that he has every right to participate at the school, live in school housing, and be a guest of the staff at functions related to his kids and also functions for staff.

[Anonymous]

I too do not know how Hyde would subject themselves to the liability by having a known pedepile on their campus.

Dubinsky should not be allowed within 10 feet of the Hyde Campus.  They say because of the past incidences along with the lawsuit against the school several years ago, he won't ever be a full time staff member, but this leaves open the door for other involvements at the school.  I was told he helped coach a female sports team last year and is around campus quite often as the husband  of a faculty member and parent of a student,

This involvement at the school allows Dubinsky to continue to engage in inappropriate behavior towards females and would not be accepted under any circumstances at a reputable school..  You are right about the liability issue.  Hyde is opening itself up to many lawsuits with this known problem.  They have a responsibility to the rest of the student body and yet seem to overlook this.

As a professional I highly advise Hyde to keep Dubinsky away from their female population.  They know it, they are aware of it, and if they chose to ignore all the warning signs then they open themselves up to future lawsuits of a magnitude they might not be ready for.

A professional what, bus driver? Do you know this guy Dubinsky? Have you evaluated him professionally? Did he ever ride your bus?  Do you know the facts of the case first-hand, or just the ridiculous crap you read here?  If you are a professional at ANYTHING, how can you begin to pass judgement on something based on heresay and innuendo. Go back to your bus...

[Anonymous]

I too do not know how Hyde would subject themselves to the liability by having a known pedepile on their campus.

Dubinsky should not be allowed within 10 feet of the Hyde Campus.  They say because of the past incidences along with the lawsuit against the school several years ago, he won't ever be a full time staff member, but this leaves open the door for other involvements at the school.  I was told he helped coach a female sports team last year and is around campus quite often as the husband  of a faculty member and parent of a student,

This involvement at the school allows Dubinsky to continue to engage in inappropriate behavior towards females and would not be accepted under any circumstances at a reputable school..  You are right about the liability issue.  Hyde is opening itself up to many lawsuits with this known problem.  They have a responsibility to the rest of the student body and yet seem to overlook this.

As a professional I highly advise Hyde to keep Dubinsky away from their female population.  They know it, they are aware of it, and if they chose to ignore all the warning signs then they open themselves up to future lawsuits of a magnitude they might not be ready for.

A professional what, bus driver? Do you know this guy Dubinsky? Have you evaluated him professionally? Did he ever ride your bus?  Do you know the facts of the case first-hand, or just the ridiculous crap you read here?  If you are a professional at ANYTHING, how can you begin to pass judgement on something based on heresay and innuendo. Go back to your bus...

I did not write the previous post but why are you questioning someones bad experience at Hyde?  I don't know if this poster went to Hyde at the same time as me, but yes larry dubinsky was known as "scary larry" and lots of faculty would talk about him and shake their heads or laugh when we told them of the latest b.s. he would try on us.  I won't go back to "my bus" or to Hyde.  Not ever.  They don't take anything seriously and when you try to complain the staff is not interested and instead they put you on 2-4 for an attitude problem. The staff who have been there a long time are afraid to stand up to the Gaulds. When telling my parents they told me to try to put up with it until the end of the year because they had already paid for the full year.

Hyde SUCKS!!  Some people might like Hyde, I hated it. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion

[Anonymous]

I recently was alerted to Larry Dubinsky being around campus again through this website.  I checked out the link to the Hyde Newsletter and see there is a notice about Donna and Larry's remarriage.  I also saw the picture of Dubinsky in the Hyde Newsletter with the notice that they remarried at the "Hyde Mansion."

Can you please tell me how Hyde can justify keeping Dubinsky  close to the student body and to the Administration after the many years of complaints by female students?  Does Hyde need to see him feeling up one of the girls with their own eyes in order to believe all the many complaints about him?

Get wise Hyde!

Its just a matter of time that Larry Dubinsky is inapropriate with another girl who stands up to Hyde and another law suit comes about. If that were to occur, Hyde will be screwed. The fact that its gone to court already says something, but for it to happen again I can assure he will be banned from campus. It makes me sick inside to think that it has to take another girl to feel violated by this PERVERT, for the school to do anything about it.

What makes me even more sick inside is Hyde makes anyone who stands up to them considered a perpertraitor and Larry is looked at as a victim. I was an intern when the whole thing went down with Larry. Did you know that when the victim went to the headmaster about Larry's behavior, she then was forced to have a meeting with him and had to tell him exactly what he did to her and how it made her feel.  This how they like to handle things "in house". They never even called the girl's parents. I can't imagine how she felt in that meeting. I praise her for her strength and courage. It takes a lot of courage to stand up to these people. It really is like a "cult" and if you don't follow their belief system, you are screwed and have to go through hell and back while there.

I would hate to see this happen to someone else. Keep up the posts and keep potential parents/students informed.

[Anonymous]

Hyde's behavior in all this is old hat and nothing new.  They took that stance 30 years ago, they take it now, and they probably took it many times inbetween that we don't (yet) know about.

Always blame the victim.  Always confuse the community by spreading lies.  Always stand behind the perpetrator - who is, after all, one of them - and shield them from the appropriate justice...

Same old, same old...  very very depressing.

I commend the young woman in the current round for her courage and integrity.

[Anonymous]

Hyde's behavior in all this is old hat and nothing new.  They took that stance 30 years ago, they take it now, and they probably took it many times inbetween that we don't (yet) know about.

Always blame the victim.  Always confuse the community by spreading lies.  Always stand behind the perpetrator - who is, after all, one of them - and shield them from the appropriate justice...

Same old, same old...  very very depressing.

I commend the young woman in the current round for her courage and integrity.

If this same thing happened in the public school system, the perp would never be allowed on campus again. For that matter he probably would have been arrested.  How does Hyde get away with this?  Didn't Hyde report the incident?  Aren't they required to?

[Anonymous]

Hyde's behavior in all this is old hat and nothing new.  They took that stance 30 years ago, they take it now, and they probably took it many times inbetween that we don't (yet) know about.

Always blame the victim.  Always confuse the community by spreading lies.  Always stand behind the perpetrator - who is, after all, one of them - and shield them from the appropriate justice...

Same old, same old...  very very depressing.

I commend the young woman in the current round for her courage and integrity.

If this same thing happened in the public school system, the perp would never be allowed on campus again. For that matter he probably would have been arrested.  How does Hyde get away with this?  Didn't Hyde report the incident?  Aren't they required to?

You would think.  It blows my mind.  I know for sure that they hide behind the alleged confusion stemming from "he said/she said" confutations, but even if the women ripped off their garments and implored "take me, NOW" it is still statuatory rape, and, in the capacity of being charged with the well-being of minors in their care, they are "mandatory reporters" and are required to report even alleged such abuses.  Maybe the laws in Maine and Connecticutt are different, I don't know.

It is almost as if they subscribe to what I have read/been told is one of the key tenets of est, i.e., that you are responsible for everything that happens to you.

In the earlier case, the girl was grilled in meeting after meeting with administrators, and was told that she had responsibility for it (even though she was asleep at the time and BT had to awaken her to do his dirty deed).  The fact that he was the Dean of Students at the time and was slated to take over the Assistant Headmaster post the following year no doubt contributed to their interpretation of events.

[Anonymous]

I recently was alerted to Larry Dubinsky being around campus again through this website.  I checked out the link to the Hyde Newsletter and see there is a notice about Donna and Larry's remarriage.  I also saw the picture of Dubinsky in the Hyde Newsletter with the notice that they remarried at the "Hyde Mansion."

Can you please tell me how Hyde can justify keeping Dubinsky  close to the student body and to the Administration after the many years of complaints by female students?  Does Hyde need to see him feeling up one of the girls with their own eyes in order to believe all the many complaints about him?

Get wise Hyde!

Your description of Hyde's handling of this awful episode sounds so typical of the Hyde I know.  That is, point fingers, try to keep it quiet, don't take responsibility, blame the victim.  Hyde seems to operate as a caricature, living in its own worped reality.  Hyde needs to feel some intense heat; maybe this web site is turning up the temperature.  Only then, I figure, will Hyde end up being held accountable.


Its just a matter of time that Larry Dubinsky is inapropriate with another girl who stands up to Hyde and another law suit comes about. If that were to occur, Hyde will be screwed. The fact that its gone to court already says something, but for it to happen again I can assure he will be banned from campus. It makes me sick inside to think that it has to take another girl to feel violated by this PERVERT, for the school to do anything about it.

What makes me even more sick inside is Hyde makes anyone who stands up to them considered a perpertraitor and Larry is looked at as a victim. I was an intern when the whole thing went down with Larry. Did you know that when the victim went to the headmaster about Larry's behavior, she then was forced to have a meeting with him and had to tell him exactly what he did to her and how it made her feel.  This how they like to handle things "in house". They never even called the girl's parents. I can't imagine how she felt in that meeting. I praise her for her strength and courage. It takes a lot of courage to stand up to these people. It really is like a "cult" and if you don't follow their belief system, you are screwed and have to go through hell and back while there.

I would hate to see this happen to someone else. Keep up the posts and keep potential parents/students informed.

[Anonymous]

I recently was alerted to Larry Dubinsky being around campus again through this website.  I checked out the link to the Hyde Newsletter and see there is a notice about Donna and Larry's remarriage.  I also saw the picture of Dubinsky in the Hyde Newsletter with the notice that they remarried at the "Hyde Mansion."

Can you please tell me how Hyde can justify keeping Dubinsky  close to the student body and to the Administration after the many years of complaints by female students?  Does Hyde need to see him feeling up one of the girls with their own eyes in order to believe all the many complaints about him?

Get wise Hyde!

Its just a matter of time that Larry Dubinsky is inapropriate with another girl who stands up to Hyde and another law suit comes about. If that were to occur, Hyde will be screwed. The fact that its gone to court already says something, but for it to happen again I can assure he will be banned from campus. It makes me sick inside to think that it has to take another girl to feel violated by this PERVERT, for the school to do anything about it.

What makes me even more sick inside is Hyde makes anyone who stands up to them considered a perpertraitor and Larry is looked at as a victim. I was an intern when the whole thing went down with Larry. Did you know that when the victim went to the headmaster about Larry's behavior, she then was forced to have a meeting with him and had to tell him exactly what he did to her and how it made her feel.  This how they like to handle things "in house". They never even called the girl's parents. I can't imagine how she felt in that meeting. I praise her for her strength and courage. It takes a lot of courage to stand up to these people. It really is like a "cult" and if you don't follow their belief system, you are screwed and have to go through hell and back while there.

I would hate to see this happen to someone else. Keep up the posts and keep potential parents/students informed.

Your description of Hyde's handling of this awful episode sounds so typical of the Hyde I know. That is, point fingers, try to keep it quiet, don't take responsibility, blame the victim. Hyde seems to operate as a caricature, living in its own worped reality. Hyde needs to feel some intense heat; maybe this web site is turning up the temperature. Only then, I figure, will Hyde end up being held accountable.

[Anonymous]

In the earlier case, the girl was grilled in meeting after meeting with administrators, and was told that she had responsibility for it (even though she was asleep at the time and BT had to awaken her to do his dirty deed). The fact that he was the Dean of Students at the time and was slated to take over the Assistant Headmaster post the following year no doubt contributed to their interpretation of events.

When you say "earlier case" are you talking about another incident long ago vs the one that seems to have happened a few years back?  What campus was this on?  Can you say who the perp was or whether he is still involved at Hyde?

As far as the one that happened a few years back, I remember the perp Dubinsky did not have sex with the girl, but touched her in a sexual way.  Dubinsky has been pulling this crap for years.  He would cop a feel whenever he could get away with it and stare us up and down with his eyes everytime he passed by. He was disgusting.  The fact that we got no support from faculty stunk.  Everyone joked and laughed about what a pervert he was.  Faculty even talked about it.  If faculty is honest then why did they keep silent knowing what was going on? They are just as guilty for allowing it and they all did, especially Dubinsky's good friends.

[Anonymous]

In the earlier case, the girl was grilled in meeting after meeting with administrators, and was told that she had responsibility for it (even though she was asleep at the time and BT had to awaken her to do his dirty deed). The fact that he was the Dean of Students at the time and was slated to take over the Assistant Headmaster post the following year no doubt contributed to their interpretation of events.

When you say "earlier case" are you talking about another incident long ago vs the one that seems to have happened a few years back?  What campus was this on?  Can you say who the perp was or whether he is still involved at Hyde?

As far as the one that happened a few years back, I remember the perp Dubinsky did not have sex with the girl, but touched her in a sexual way.  Dubinsky has been pulling this crap for years.  He would cop a feel whenever he could get away with it and stare us up and down with his eyes everytime he passed by. He was disgusting.  The fact that we got no support from faculty stunk.  Everyone joked and laughed about what a pervert he was.  Faculty even talked about it.  If faculty is honest then why did they keep silent knowing what was going on? They are just as guilty for allowing it and they all did, especially Dubinsky's good friends.

How would you know about BT _and_ Larry at Woodstock?

[Anonymous]

earlier case:  1975, BT, Bath
recent case:  200X, LD, Woodstock

[Anonymous]

earlier case:  1975, BT, Bath
recent case:  200X, LD, Woodstock

Right,

   But you seem to have first hand knowledge of both.  Which would make you a member of a very small set.  I am wondering, knowing that Hyde reads this board why you would identifiy yourself.  Are you pissed at hyde?
   I would have to say that having Larry back on campus seems like very poor judgement to me.  I was shocked that no one grabbed BT and walked off campus when he was there recently.  It was like letting Charlie Manson out on parole and letting him vistit the Tate/Labanca house.  OK gross hyperbole.

Emil Nightrate