On 2006-04-08 12:05:00, Anonymous wrote:
Well DUH .. but it doesn't excuse publishing documents just because you can. Any advocate can do what she's doing whether they work for a lawfirm as a paralegal or not. ISAC doesn't do it and either does TAUSA or any of the other groups and websites. So let's just call a spade a spade and stop with the excuses.
"
let's do call a spade a spade. links were posted to most of the leading survivor/advocate sites which did not redact the names of minors. if you don't want to check those links fine, but indeed, every site i looked at contains such documents.
for the record, i support redacting the names, particularly if the family requests it. i can't get behind the caca shit storm attack based on the falicy being perpetrated- that she/they have done something different than the other sites in terms of court documents. it's clearly not true.
also for the record, i support the other sites and my comments aren't intended as critisism toward them. i just fail to see where they have done it differently. hammer another, valid, point.
i'd still like to see examples of plagerism. and would like to know which of the deaths you consider to be inaccurate. those claims were made. now, show the proof. and what was done to the Whitmore parents- plural- as in more than joyce.