anonymity on this board

[Anonymous]

On 2006-04-13 15:16:00, Lars wrote:



Whoops!  Thought you were the other guy trying to twist around something I said.  Cheers! ::cheers:: "

Could have been, don't know.  I wasn't the one that put a link up to that post.  I just read it and responded.  [ This Message was edited by: Eudora on 2006-04-13 17:39 ]

[Antigen]

On 2006-04-13 06:36:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Get the story straight...Lars was called to ask why he felt that way, not that he shouldn't feel that way.  When someone graduates from Hyde the way he did, as a leader and recipient of a Diploma, one would be confused when reading his numerous diatribes on how much he hated the school and how he "played" the game.



So the call was out of concern from someone who called him/herself a friend during the time Lars spent his time at Hyde.



I am so sick of your Hyde bashing, when you know nothing more than you've read on this hianus site!"

Lars seems to have a very well informed opinion, being a certified good enough Hyde graduate and all. Why not just... take his word for it that he means just what he says publicly? Or, better yet, if you had questions  about his public comments, why jump right in in the same public arena and ask away?

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use

--Galileo Galilei

[Antigen]

On 2006-04-13 07:05:00, Anonymous wrote:

Kinda makes you wonder how hyde decides who has charater and who does not. Karma hit the Dogma on this one. Better luck next time. Thanks for playing.

You wanna talk about duplicity? You just spelled it out and probably don't even know it. How duplistic is it the way all of these programs praise, unconditionally anyone who gives them all the credit for all they've accomplished in life, but when the very same person criticizes the unquestionable goodness and rightness of said program, all of a sudden not only is he obviously a fuckup in life and a total loser, but more pitiful still for blaming the Program (that just took credit for everything good in the guy's life up intil you read this)

It's enough ta make ya dizzy, I tell ya! As de dawg chases his tail...

All our liberties are due to men who, when their conscience has compelled them, have broken the laws of the land.
--William Kingdon Clifford

[Anonymous]

On 2006-04-13 16:15:00, Eudora wrote:

"

On 2006-04-13 07:05:00, Anonymous wrote:


Kinda makes you wonder how hyde decides who has charater and who does not. Karma hit the Dogma on this one. Better luck next time. Thanks for playing.

You wanna talk about duplicity? You just spelled it out and probably don't even know it. How duplistic is it the way all of these programs praise, unconditionally anyone who gives them all the credit for all they've accomplished in life, but when the very same person criticizes the unquestionable goodness and rightness of said program, all of a sudden not only is he obviously a fuckup in life and a total loser, but more pitiful still for blaming the Program (that just took credit for everything good in the guy's life up intil you read this)



It's enough ta make ya dizzy, I tell ya! As de dawg chases his tail...

All our liberties are due to men who, when their conscience has compelled them, have broken the laws of the land.
--William Kingdon Clifford

"

That was kind of my point, you agree you good, you disagree you bad. I guess I have issues with those that agree to get by. It is really my problem. Virtue is it own reward.

sue

[Antigen]

On 2006-04-13 12:00:00, Anonymous wrote:

 Lars, dude, if Hyde faculty contacted you, former classmate or not, given the context, I see no basis for your presumption of some obligation of privacy, moral or otherwise.

Ok, grease to the geese is gravy to the gander, right? So then should Lars call up your mommy and daddy and try and find out why you're being so mean to him in this public forum? What kind of a nut case does shit like that?

One kind. I knew a bunch of people like that over 20 years ago. Fought long and hard to maintain a grip on my sanity till eventually going to court to escape the crazy bastards.

I have never seen the slightest scientific proof of the religious theories of heaven and hell, of future life for individuals, or of a personal God.
--Thomas Edison, American inventor

[Antigen]

On 2006-04-13 12:20:00, StephenLong wrote:

Trying to figure out which anonymous said what to the other anonymous makes it difficult to follow the conversation and make sense out of it.

Also makes it harder for someont to piece together clues over the long term and ID the author.

May your days be joyously challenging and your words artfully true.
--Ginger Warbis

[Anonymous]

Antigen and Eudora, you've taken a rather entertaining diologue and turned it into an unintelligable babble...

Shut the fuck up!!

[Anonymous]

On 2006-04-14 09:08:00, Eudora wrote:

"

On 2006-04-13 12:00:00, Anonymous wrote:


 Lars, dude, if Hyde faculty contacted you, former classmate or not, given the context, I see no basis for your presumption of some obligation of privacy, moral or otherwise.

Ok, grease to the geese is gravy to the gander, right? So then should Lars call up your mommy and daddy and try and find out why you're being so mean to him in this public forum? What kind of a nut case does shit like that?



One kind. I knew a bunch of people like that over 20 years ago. Fought long and hard to maintain a grip on my sanity till eventually going to court to escape the crazy bastards.

I have never seen the slightest scientific proof of the religious theories of heaven and hell, of future life for individuals, or of a personal God.
--Thomas Edison, American inventor

"

Lar can call my Mom and Dad.  He will need a necromancer to dial for him.  

Sue Doenym

[Anonymous]

On 2006-04-14 09:08:00, Eudora wrote:

"

Ok, grease to the geese is gravy to the gander, right? So then should Lars call up your mommy and daddy and try and find out why you're being so mean to him in this public forum? What kind of a nut case does shit like that?"

Jeez Eudora, I had kinda hoped you were a little smarter than that, but at this point can only conclude your lack of logic skills makes you the odds on favorite to win the election for village idiot.  I will try and help you...

Hyde's relationship with Lars' parents preceded Hyde's relationship with Lars.

Hyde's relationship with Lars' parents is independent of Lars, even if it relates to their mutual concern for him.

Lars has no relationship with my parents whatsoever, let alone was their relationship the way I met Lars, ergo your analogy that somehow I should be ok with Lars calling my family is WHACK.

Let me try a different analogy.  Three people are friends for a long time.  One day, Friend 1 finds out that Friend 2 is publicly bashing Friend 1.  Friend 1 calls Friend 2 to talk about it (to no avail), and the next time Friend 1 and Friend 3 (the person who introduced Friend 1 and Friend 2) talk, it comes up in conversation.

Its really not much more complicated than that....except that Friend 1 and Friend 3 have a business relationship and talk with predictable regularity, making their communication all the more expected, natural and reasonable.

Isn't that more the case here?  Anyway, at the end of the day Lars has continued to fail to identify any (moral or otherwise) basis for claiming Hyde does not respect privacy based on the example he cited.

This is the subject which Lars seems to have trouble staying on track on....possibly ADD or something like that....because he just keeps changing the topic.  And you, Eudora, without any association or connection with Hyde, you just aid and abet.  Wouldn't want one of your faithful followers shown to have made an unsubstantiated allegation, right?  (Jeez, dare I say it....but it seems maybe you have created your own cult?)

To me, Lars seems so invested in defending his position on Hyde that even when wrong, he holds on as if his life depended on it.  I'm not sure about you, but that tells me a lot about Lars (and his posts).

Sybergal
(Yes, names are good -- I will try and adhere as well....most well run websites I know won't allow anonymous posts and limit users to a single name....otherwise, as stated, its nearly impossible to have a meaningful dialogue, the site devolves to trash-talking garbage posts, and its not a big leap to guess that 99% of the posts are the same three people.)

[Anonymous]

On 2006-04-15 00:35:00, Anonymous wrote:



Jeez Eudora, I had kinda hoped you were a little smarter than that, but at this point can only conclude your lack of logic skills makes you the odds on favorite to win the election for village idiot.  I will try and help you...

 That kind of stuff works well with the Rush and Bill ORielly crowd, but any one with solidly three digit IQ recognizes an ad Hominum attack as a cheap rhetorical technique and the sign of a weak argument. BTW I think Eudora is a very sharp wimmin.

Let me try a different analogy.  Three people are friends for a long time.  One day, Friend 1 finds out that Friend 2 is publicly bashing Friend 1.  Friend 1 calls Friend 2 to talk about it (to no avail), and the next time Friend 1 and Friend 3 (the person who introduced Friend 1 and Friend 2) talk, it comes up in conversation.

I don't think it was totally wrong. I think it is pretty much like you said.  The three have a relationship.  With that said, I had a volunteer from Hyde call me a while back.  The tentative tone in her voice was plain.  I asked her about it.  She said some people freak when Hyde calls. So to take Lars point of view let me change your analogy a little:

3 people/groups My parents, my crazy x boy freind, me.

I caught my x with my mothers panties over his head masturbating in the living room. I show him the door. He is a little crazy.  He walks the line on the stalking thing for a while then fades away.
I post on a web site for wimmin recoving from crazy men.  MY x sees it and call my parents to complain.  Since my parents are pretty strait laced I never told them about the pantie fetish.  My X is active in our local church as is my parents.  My parent call me and ask why I am saying bad things about that nice boy that is active in our church. I am unhappy about the situation. Am I rong? The situation above is ambigious. Hyde does not do grey well. It is like I love Lucy reruns: great in black and white.

This is the subject which Lars seems to have trouble staying on track on....possibly ADD or something like that

I don't think it is ADD. Since Lars confessed to choosing his college based on soft core porn, my guess it he has some internet porn open in another browser window and it is distracting him.  He is typing with one hand if you know what I mean.

Sybergal

(Yes, names are good -- I will try and adhere as well....most well run websites I know won't allow anonymous posts and limit users to a single name....otherwise, as stated, its nearly impossible to have a meaningful dialogue, the site devolves to trash-talking garbage posts, and its not a big leap to guess that 99% of the posts are the same three people.)"

 I suspect that "that 99% of the posts are the same three people" and when you pose a question that is hard for them to answer they stop posting. Since Hyde ,unlike other private secondary schools, does not have an IQ bogie to gain admission, some of the folks that attended are not the brightest bulbs in the knife draw.

Sue Doenym

[Anonymous]

On 2006-04-13 11:20:00, Anonymous wrote:

"you started it with your "dick" comment."

Is that what you got from your Hyde Charater Education?  Delve down to the lowest common denominator?  I was trying to goad you into reponding to my post.  But I see you can not.

Sue

[Anonymous]

Getting kind of crazy around here.  

Sybergal, why don't you let us know about the total of three people posting here?  I completely disagree.  I see at least 10-15 styles of posting by going back a few months.  Is it that you can't stand someone talking negatively about Hyde School or are you just trying to make false statements to throw potential parents off about how bad Hyde School is?

To make matters worse, Hyde has now appointed Malcolm Gaulds wife as the part time Headmaster of Woodstock campus!  How bizarre is that?  There are very needy and messed up kids at Hyde.  Why would you put someone in charge who has to commute from one state to the other?  If there are so many wonderful teachers at the Woodstock campus then why not put them in the position as Headmaster?

[Lars]

On 2006-04-15 00:35:00, Anonymous wrote:

"

On 2006-04-14 09:08:00, Eudora wrote:


"

Ok, grease to the geese is gravy to the gander, right? So then should Lars call up your mommy and daddy and try and find out why you're being so mean to him in this public forum? What kind of a nut case does shit like that?"

Jeez Eudora, I had kinda hoped you were a little smarter than that, but at this point can only conclude your lack of logic skills makes you the odds on favorite to win the election for village idiot.  I will try and help you...



Hyde's relationship with Lars' parents preceded Hyde's relationship with Lars.



Hyde's relationship with Lars' parents is independent of Lars, even if it relates to their mutual concern for him.



Lars has no relationship with my parents whatsoever, let alone was their relationship the way I met Lars, ergo your analogy that somehow I should be ok with Lars calling my family is WHACK.



Let me try a different analogy.  Three people are friends for a long time.  One day, Friend 1 finds out that Friend 2 is publicly bashing Friend 1.  Friend 1 calls Friend 2 to talk about it (to no avail), and the next time Friend 1 and Friend 3 (the person who introduced Friend 1 and Friend 2) talk, it comes up in conversation.



Its really not much more complicated than that....except that Friend 1 and Friend 3 have a business relationship and talk with predictable regularity, making their communication all the more expected, natural and reasonable.



Isn't that more the case here?  Anyway, at the end of the day Lars has continued to fail to identify any (moral or otherwise) basis for claiming Hyde does not respect privacy based on the example he cited.



This is the subject which Lars seems to have trouble staying on track on....possibly ADD or something like that....because he just keeps changing the topic.  And you, Eudora, without any association or connection with Hyde, you just aid and abet.  Wouldn't want one of your faithful followers shown to have made an unsubstantiated allegation, right?  (Jeez, dare I say it....but it seems maybe you have created your own cult?)



To me, Lars seems so invested in defending his position on Hyde that even when wrong, he holds on as if his life depended on it.  I'm not sure about you, but that tells me a lot about Lars (and his posts).



Sybergal

(Yes, names are good -- I will try and adhere as well....most well run websites I know won't allow anonymous posts and limit users to a single name....otherwise, as stated, its nearly impossible to have a meaningful dialogue, the site devolves to trash-talking garbage posts, and its not a big leap to guess that 99% of the posts are the same three people.)"

You remind of me what I hated most about Hyde - the know it all who can't make a logical argument, but simply resorts to half-assed putdowns.  I answered your question about the respect for privacy.  The fact that Hyde may have relationship with my parents does not justify conveying any information about my conversation with a former classmate/faculty member.  Their relationship with my parents did not precede their relationship with me and at this point, is entirely independent of any relationship they have with me.  That means they have no business discussing my feelings about the place with them.  You've failed to to come up with a single reason why my interaction with anyone from the school is fair game for them to bring up with my folks.

Good thing you're not a lawyer.  Our profession  requires reasoning skills AND a respect for privacy.  You have neither.

[ This Message was edited by: Lars on 2006-04-15 11:39 ][ This Message was edited by: Lars on 2006-04-15 11:40 ]

[Anonymous]

On 2006-04-15 11:28:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Getting kind of crazy around here.  



Sybergal, why don't you let us know about the total of three people posting here?  I completely disagree.  I see at least 10-15 styles of posting by going back a few months.  Is it that you can't stand someone talking negatively about Hyde School or are you just trying to make false statements to throw potential parents off about how bad Hyde School is?



To make matters worse, Hyde has now appointed Malcolm Gaulds wife as the part time Headmaster of Woodstock campus!  How bizarre is that?  There are very needy and messed up kids at Hyde.  Why would you put someone in charge who has to commute from one state to the other?  If there are so many wonderful teachers at the Woodstock campus then why not put them in the position as Headmaster?



"

I suppose having Malcolm Gauld's wife take over at Woodstock helps the Gauld family continue its tight control over the operation.  This takes the Hyde incest to a new level.  This may not be a monopoly in the formal sense, but it's close.  I guess there's not much chance that Hyde will let any outside air in, which means that the school will likely continue its ways.  All the more reason to look somewhere else for the right school for your kid.

[Anonymous]

hyde let outside air in once and nearly put the place outta business.