Author Topic: Second Nature Wilderness Program  (Read 75230 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #90 on: March 22, 2006, 09:12:00 PM »
DJ has a way with elevating any discussion and Eudora has a way with stopping them cold with absolutely nothing new to offer.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #91 on: March 22, 2006, 11:08:00 PM »
your elevator must go one way-  DOWN
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #92 on: March 22, 2006, 11:23:00 PM »
Quote
On 2006-03-22 15:02:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I think the perfect Katie is somewhere between 3 and 7.  I hope we are all around when the shit hits the fan in the Katie/Julie household.  That poor kid doesn't stand a chance."


Wow.  Three idiots or one?  Can't hardly tell.

I've mentioned before that Katie is ten.  I've mentioned before that I'm a professional writer and can type these posts as fast as I could say them to your face.

With everything you say, you guys convince me more that not only don't you understand children, you just don't understand *people* very well.

Everything I want to say from here, Dale Carnegie said better in _How to Win Friends and Influence People_.

You guys' biggest problem as parents is that you never figured out kids are just people.

My friends have teenage kids.  We talk.  They agree with me on this, not you.  They don't parent exactly like I would, obviously, because their kids are different people from my kid.  They're good parents because they see their kids as people, not as some mythical subhuman entity called a "teenager."

Free clue.  My friends with teenage kids think you Program Parents are walking nightmares.

Julie
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #93 on: March 22, 2006, 11:34:00 PM »
So, have you decided if Katie will prefer pink or purple condoms?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #94 on: March 22, 2006, 11:35:00 PM »
I've not read your life history so I didn't know how old Katie is.  Good luck.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #95 on: March 23, 2006, 12:12:00 AM »
Quote
<  My friends with teenage kids think you Program Parents are walking nightmares.



Julie"


Have the sons of your friends beaten their mothers or young daughters while they were hopped up on whatever drug they could get their hands on?  Until you've been there, it's hard to say what you would do.  A walking nightmare did that in our home. It was our son.  Imagine how you would feel if Katie had an older brother and beat you both bloody.  It changes lives and perspectives.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #96 on: March 23, 2006, 12:19:00 AM »
Quote
On 2006-03-22 15:26:00, Anonymous wrote:

"Ok, DJ you make some valid points.  I realize that my kid's success may be an anomaly.  Julie, I think, has her heart in the right place but is blinded by arrogance and an "it won't happen to me" mentality.  One anon obviously hates Julie and is cynical.  Another anon likes the program and occasionally weighs in to keep this thread balanced.  Eudora obviously has had a bad experience and I'm sorry for her.  But, my last word is that Second Nature Wilderness Program is a good place with a safe record, a talented, educated staff and lots of former parents and students that believe in it.  That's where this started and that where I'm signing off.  I'm not going to beat this dead horse.  Though it was fun realizing yet one more time that I did the right thing and wasn't a wasted afternoon defending my decision and the program.  "


Don't mistake annoyance for arrogance.  

My kid will go through her teenage years just like everybody else does.  They'll be rough.  Adolescence is a tough life stage, whether you're the teen or the parent.  Adolescence is just plain hard.

Programs are a bad "solution" to a tough life stage that can't be "solved" in the first place---it can only be navigated.

Teenagers "happen" to parents in the same way that two year olds do, and for the same reason.

Arrogant?  I've just been through enough tough shit in life, and have enough respect and admiration for my husband, and have enough respect for our extended family, that I'm confident we'll cope.  People do, you know.

You guys sound like divorcees predicting doom on the eve of every wedding.  That's for the same old reasons, too.  The predictions of doom have a lot more to do with the acrimony of the predicter's divorce than with the compatibility prospects of the couple.

I love it when people hear confidence that someone can cope and take it as naivete or presume they're living the life of Reilly and have not a care in the world.  You never know what burdens the other guy is carrying.

I'm not saying I'm better than the other parents in my community in my ability to cope.  Parents cope.  Most well enough, some very badly.  I'm not perfect, but I'm about average for my community---we're blessed with a lot of good parents (involved, see that the homework is done, go to conferences, apply responsible discipline and don't think our kids are perfect).

I'm not saying Program Parents have no burdens to carry.  Of course they do.  They just tend to assume they're the only ones with heavy burdens to carry.  Sure Program Parents have burdens--Programs are a very bad choice about how to deal with those burdens.  I'd say analogous to the bad choice to self-medicate with anything from excessive alcohol to ice, depending on the Program.

I don't object to *care*---I'm all in favor of quality, responsible mental health care (hey, we use it.)---I just object to *bad* care that costs an arm and a leg.

Julie
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #97 on: March 23, 2006, 12:21:00 AM »
Quote


Free clue.  My friends with teenage kids think you Program Parents are walking nightmares.



Julie"


Let me guess....your friends must be college professors.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #98 on: March 23, 2006, 12:26:00 AM »
Quote
On 2006-03-22 21:12:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

<  My friends with teenage kids think you Program Parents are walking nightmares.





Julie"




Have the sons of your friends beaten their mothers or young daughters while they were hopped up on whatever drug they could get their hands on?  Until you've been there, it's hard to say what you would do.  A walking nightmare did that in our home. It was our son.  Imagine how you would feel if Katie had an older brother and beat you both bloody.  It changes lives and perspectives."


Jesus Christ. Ditto what I just said in the WWASP forum to a similar comment:

Out of control, preatory, violent crimes.

Sounds like an admission that the facility is a middle-class, private-pay prison?

If what you're saying is true, might Corey or the other boy belong in jail? Rather than incarcerated with other kids, some of whom have been refered to as spoiled brats, who weren't violent, predatory, out of control?

Is that why some of these places are run like Oz? Because they're housing violent, predatory, juvenile criminals.
               
Post URL: http://fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?to ... 250#182977


Ya know, when you're trying to defend programs employing uncredential staff, the argument goes that the kids are not violent or seriously 'mentally ill'.
When you are deperately attempting to justify putting your kid away, they are violent, predatory criminals that need to be incarcerated.

It's obvious you didn't know how to 'help' your violent kid. So, you're solution was to board him with kids who are flunking algebra or have partners/ friends their parents don't approve of?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #99 on: March 23, 2006, 12:30:00 AM »
no, just trying to find out how much Julie will take before she takes action.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #100 on: March 23, 2006, 12:31:00 AM »
It's really fun to fuck with all of you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Troll Control

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7391
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #101 on: March 23, 2006, 08:50:00 AM »
Well, thank you all for reading my posts with an open mind.  Sometimes that's really difficult to do.

Quote
You can take that and three fity to the nearest Starbucks!


Here in NY we phrase this "That and a dollar-fifty will get you on the A train."

I think this discussion has gone very well, if you factor in for the anon troll baiting and insulting other posters.  I've said it many times before - it's a sickness...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
The Linchpin Link

Whooter - The Most Prolific Troll Fornits Has Ever Seen - The Definitive Links
**********************************************************************************************************
"Looks like a nasty aspentrolius sticci whooterensis infestation you got there, Ms. Fornits.  I\'ll get right to work."

- Troll Control

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #102 on: March 23, 2006, 11:29:00 AM »
Quote
On 2006-03-22 21:12:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

<  My friends with teenage kids think you Program Parents are walking nightmares.





Julie"




Have the sons of your friends beaten their mothers or young daughters while they were hopped up on whatever drug they could get their hands on?  Until you've been there, it's hard to say what you would do.  A walking nightmare did that in our home. It was our son.  Imagine how you would feel if Katie had an older brother and beat you both bloody.  It changes lives and perspectives."


You assume you're the only ones with problems and everybody who doesn't think like you must have and must have always had life experiences that were peachy fuzzy keen.

I've survived domestic abuse--abusive boyfriend.  He was a real psycho.

What you do when you have a kid that beats you is you call the police and press charges.

They don't go to a private juvie jail, they go to the real one.  They experience real life.  Real life teaches.  

Kids have more rights in real juvie jail than in private prison, but they can't kid themselves that they're just somewhere their parents sent them.

I've always said that some kids are criminal and should go to real juvie jail, some kids are severely, dangerously, mentally ill and need to be emergency hospitalized before outpatient treatment, some kids are addicted and need rehab.

Beating family is criminal.  It doesn't matter whether he was high or not, the beating is the thing.

There are only two reasons to pay and arm and a leg for private jail if your kid is violently criminal.  Either you think real juvie jail is too soft, or you think it's too harsh.  Either you're setting yourself up as a wrathful God to punish your kid's crime more severely than the system would, or you're trying to rescue him again/still---or you're all mixed up and it's a scrambled up bit of both.

If your kid commits a serious crime, like battering family members, you don't get between the kid and the system.  Battering family members I wouldn't hire the kid an attorney, but would expect the court to appoint one.  For anything external, I'd hire the kid an attorney---but only since/if my being able to afford one might keep the kid from having a public defender appointed by the court.  Real life is that every accused is entitled to competent legal representation.

(In real life, outside of Hollywood, lawyers for guilty clients intercede with the system to make sure the punishment the guilty client gets is just and appropriate.  Sometimes the system screws up, but far more often it approximately works--as well as anything could.)

"Tough love" exit plans aren't avoiding rescuing, they're adding imposed consequences on top of natural ones and evading genuine personal responsibilities that are real even if they aren't on the law books.

However, there is real rescuing and over-punitive behavior out there.  Sending a kid to a private prison instead of letting them take the natural consequences at the real one is motivated by rescuing, over-punitiveness, or a dysfunctional mix of both.

Some people come out of juvie or other jail the same as they went in--criminal.  Others come out and decide they really don't want to do stuff to go back.

Recidivism rates aren't that high because juvie jail "doesn't work."  Recidivism rates are that high because most of the kids or adults who get sent to prison are irretrievably broken, and some are not.  The only way to find out who is which is to let the system work itself out.

Trying to keep your kid from doing wrong is part of the job.

Getting between your kid and life when he does screw up, before he starts to genuinely change, is usually (not always) a bad idea.

There's a difference between functional supportiveness and the dysfunctional entanglement of martyrdom, over-punitiveness, and rescuing.

Using a Program is prima facie evidence of dysfunctionality.  It doesn't *work*.  A parent can be rescuing and over-controlling at the same time.  One of the hallmarks of dysfunctional families is a weird mix of same.

When their kid commits violent, criminal acts, normal, functional parents let go (beyond providing a competent lawyer if the courts won't appoint one) and let the chips fall.

When domestic battering is going on that leaves clear marks (as beating anyone bloody does), functional people call the police.

I've been abused in a relationship, I know it's not easy, but if you can move yourself to send your kid to private prison, you can move yourself to call the cops and press charges.

*I* didn't call the cops because I couldn't prove anything.  I didn't tell my parents because they were in la-la land and would have triggered the psycho to kill me without doing anything effective to prevent it.  I got myself out of the situation the first moment I could do so without getting murdered.

In a number of ways, my parents weren't grown ups and I had to be the grown up for myself as a teen.  They were human and fallible, but in this case their particular foibles would have cost me my life---as it almost did in another way/situation.

They were mostly good parents, but in these cases their human imperfections just happened to create a dangerous situation---more dangerous than staying in the relationship temporarily and biding my time.

As soon as I safely could, I left.  When he came to my parents' house after that while I was home for a visit, I could and did call the police to give him a criminal trespass warning.  I had changed the situation and that warning would have enabled me to have him prosecuted if he'd violated it--I had taken other steps to protect my life by then.

I was emotionally entangled with this psychotic, violent boy, but as soon as I could I took the necessary steps to stop the abuse anyway.

You had plenty of evidence to call the cops and get him prosecuted and convicted.

If the cops refused to arrest (for drugged up and battering, not a chance), or the DA refused to prosecute the case, then and only then I would have used a private prison.

If you called the cops repeatedly and tried to press charges, then I can't fault you for getting him out of your home whatever legal way you could.  In that case, I'd fault your local law enforcement system, not you.

Most parents have *not* gone to those lengths before using a Program.

Julie
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #103 on: March 23, 2006, 11:40:00 AM »
Quote
On 2006-03-22 21:31:00, Anonymous wrote:

"It's really fun to fuck with all of you."


I know people like you.  I kick them off a system I moderate all the time.  To a man, their various behavior before and during the process demonstrates that they're actively mentally unbalanced.

I want you to up your dose.

Julie
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Second Nature Wilderness Program
« Reply #104 on: March 23, 2006, 11:41:00 AM »
Disclaimer: Wrt the foregoing:  *In my opinion* they're unbalanced, and so are you.

Julie
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »