Hehe.
Okay, so obviously we have some disagreements and I will explain my views. No need to argue, since we obviously have differing positions.
LGAT training can be harmful to some, ineffective for many.
Escorting is dangerous, it's not regulated at all.
I think the success rate of forced treatment is obismal. We don't even know because nobody keeps stats. I think there's reason why.
I read that Carlbrook does utilize a peer or level type system. I do not agree with a hierarchy of students, because it's supposed to involve progress in the program, but it often morphs into normal teenage social hierarchy [popular and jocks]. My point, the kids who needed help the most are the ones who get ignored and picked on/fight by the older kids. The younger ones especially.
By using workshops they think there is a generic 'fix it' solution. I think the kids are all individuals with individuals issues that need to be approached in different ways.
LGAT's provide a short term relief, and dont really solve issues.
What incentive would the school have to send a kid home, they make a lot of money, so why would they not extend their stay to make more money and tweek policy towards this direction - are they not a for-profit business? 125 kids times thousands of dollars per kid/month is a lot of money.(about a half mil gross at least ..with rough math)
These are some of my differing opinions. It seems this school is "better" than WWASP, PROVO, CEDU; but there are RTC's out there that don't use LGAT, escorts, and peer-hierarchial system. You wont see their names on this website either. I think there is a pattern emerging. Why is it the programs using the tactics I listed above the only ones that get negative attention/reviews? (besides those horribly physically abusive state run boot camps of course :sad: )