On 2006-01-25 09:25:00, Dysfunction Junction wrote:
"
On 2006-01-25 09:15:00, Anonymous wrote:
"
On 2006-01-25 09:05:00, RobertBruce wrote:
"I find your tactics to be questionable at best.
Are you a parent of a teen in a place like this?
Are you a person who works for one of these institutions doing bullshit surveys?
Or are you a burnt out drug addict?"
I am a parent of a teen that attended a program and a parent to several others."
And, according to yor other posts, a burnt out drug addict as well.
In any case, I have no problem debating you. You're bringing a knife to gunfight. Just stick to the topic of the thread and if you want to talk about something else, start a new thread. Stop mucking up the forum with digression.
That's why people get mad. This is the proven tactic of HLA's staff. They muck up the forum so badly with stuff that has nothing whatsoever to do with the topic that people then cannot find what they are looking for. Then Deborah, an unpaid, thankless moderator has to spen her own personal time clearing the threads of your idiotic commentary. Why should she have to clean up your mess?
"
What is your problem?
I exposed all my posts for you to read, I did nothing but debate and, as you have read, I am not a member of any school, just a parent.
I have never caused or asked antigen to do any work.
You were the one who got frustrated with my position and asked Antigen to spend time researching me....... and what did you find?
1 wayward post which depicts me as a drug addict who is in highschool .... so either you dont want to debate high school drug addicts or parents who dont agree with you, why do you have to be so thin skinned, all debates dont have to go your way, sometimes other people are right.
I get frustrated with many other peoples positions on topics but I dont ask Antigen to do background checks on them to find some dirt...
Grow-up.
Little cats