On 2005-11-21 14:13:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Robert do you not see for yourself that If I in fact dont know when specifically you were there that there is no way to determine when precisely Devon was there either? I did not post any specific dates. And 3 months was a guess. As far as confidentiality clauses, A, I never signed one, B, The HIPPA laws werent in effect back then, and C, once again for you dense ones, I did NOT garner any information from any file. But you keep on going on and on about that. A first name and an assumed number of months is not personal or confidential information. But feel free to live out your little fantasy if that is what blows your skirt up. And by the way Robert, I posted that thing about my relationship with my ex because you keep on posting that somehow I have access to the school, which in fact, I have NONE. THat is the only reason that I posted that. "
Mrs. Gray why is this so confusing to you?
You posted that Devin had attended the same time I did in the three years you were living on campus. You also claimed he attended the school for three months. You also claimed you knew enough about his personality to know that he and I are similar.
All things with the exception of the last one that are illegal to post. Did you not just see Dans post? Its straight from the AMA. Like he said are you going to argue with them?
Think about it like this, say you were a receptionist at a psychartist office and you knew of a patient who attended sessions there.
If you sometime later no longer worked there yet revealed to someone that a person named John was there and saw the doctor for three months in 1998 you would be breaching confidentiality laws. It does not matter what you signed, you agreed to those clauses simply by working there to begin with. I find it puzzeling that you would even argue a signature is nessecary for an agreement to be in effect. After all we never agreed to anything at HLA yet we were bound to keep certian ones were we not?
You released personal information about someone that you had no right to release. Are you really that stupid that you cant understand that?
A first name is personal.
A length of stay is personal.
A time period is personal.
Why are you confused on that point? Those laws have always been there HIPPA or not.
Also Im still waiting on you to explain how you would have enough information concerning his personality since you never actually knew him.
But again youre far to much a coward to ever answer that question because it reveals the truth about you. The fact that you never knew him to begin with and got the information from a file and an employee.